Sampling Distributions as Regularization in Learned Inverse Problems
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911714566471680 |
|---|---|
| author | Babyale, Sandra R. Mead, Jodi |
| author_facet | Babyale, Sandra R. Mead, Jodi |
| contents | Neural networks have emerged as effective tools for solving ill-posed inverse problems. In many scientific applications, however, observational training data are insufficient, and learned inverse operators must instead be trained on synthetic data generated from the forward model. This requires specifying unknown parameters in the forward model and solving the model to generate synthetic observations. Typically, the unknown parameters are sampled from a prescribed probability distribution. Here, we show that this sampling strategy is not a neutral preprocessing step, but instead defines an implicit regularization operator. This result follows from the fact that the learned inverse operator minimizes empirical risk together with the classical result that conditional expectation minimizes mean-square error. We present theoretical results for the implicit regularization operator in both infinite- and finite-data settings, including Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). These results are demonstrated numerically on three inverse problems of increasing complexity: a 1D linear Fredholm integral equation, a 1D nonlinear subsurface interface inversion, and a 2D nonlinear cross-well seismic traveltime tomography problem. Across all three problems, three distinct sources of regularization are identified in the learned operator: prior sampling, architectural, and physics-informed regularization. A mismatched sampling distribution is shown to degrade reconstruction quality in ways that neither more expressive architectures nor augmented physics residuals can fully correct. The results demonstrate that the sampling distribution should be chosen with the same care as a classical regularization functional and provide a practical framework for implementing more sophisticated regularization operators using neural networks. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_25177 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Sampling Distributions as Regularization in Learned Inverse Problems Babyale, Sandra R. Mead, Jodi Numerical Analysis 65J22, 65J20, 68T07 Neural networks have emerged as effective tools for solving ill-posed inverse problems. In many scientific applications, however, observational training data are insufficient, and learned inverse operators must instead be trained on synthetic data generated from the forward model. This requires specifying unknown parameters in the forward model and solving the model to generate synthetic observations. Typically, the unknown parameters are sampled from a prescribed probability distribution. Here, we show that this sampling strategy is not a neutral preprocessing step, but instead defines an implicit regularization operator. This result follows from the fact that the learned inverse operator minimizes empirical risk together with the classical result that conditional expectation minimizes mean-square error. We present theoretical results for the implicit regularization operator in both infinite- and finite-data settings, including Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). These results are demonstrated numerically on three inverse problems of increasing complexity: a 1D linear Fredholm integral equation, a 1D nonlinear subsurface interface inversion, and a 2D nonlinear cross-well seismic traveltime tomography problem. Across all three problems, three distinct sources of regularization are identified in the learned operator: prior sampling, architectural, and physics-informed regularization. A mismatched sampling distribution is shown to degrade reconstruction quality in ways that neither more expressive architectures nor augmented physics residuals can fully correct. The results demonstrate that the sampling distribution should be chosen with the same care as a classical regularization functional and provide a practical framework for implementing more sophisticated regularization operators using neural networks. |
| title | Sampling Distributions as Regularization in Learned Inverse Problems |
| topic | Numerical Analysis 65J22, 65J20, 68T07 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25177 |