Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jungherr, Andreas, Schlude, Antonia, Rauchfleisch, Adrian
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25196
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917529311510528
author Jungherr, Andreas
Schlude, Antonia
Rauchfleisch, Adrian
author_facet Jungherr, Andreas
Schlude, Antonia
Rauchfleisch, Adrian
contents AI-enabled military systems are a fixture of modern military conflict. Applications vary from autonomous drones for surveillance and attack to AI-supported target selection. The importance of AI for modern conflict shows also in public disputes between governments and technology companies over the conditions for military access to frontier AI. Both military uses and government attempts at enabling and steering them happen before a backdrop of public opinion, yet we still know little about how people think about military AI. Drawing on a preregistered survey of 9,000 respondents in nine countries, including China, Germany, and the United States, we examine whether support for military AI is shaped primarily by general attitudes toward AI, principled opposition to lethal autonomy, or foreign-policy and geopolitical orientations. Across six military AI scenarios that vary in lethality and human control, respondents who view AI as beneficial are substantially more supportive of military AI. Hawkish respondents are also more supportive. By contrast, principled opposition to lethal autonomy is not broadly associated with the full index but is related to the application of fully autonomous lethal force. Contrary to our expectation, perceived AI risks are positively associated with support. Cross-national differences are moderate and broadly consistent with geopolitical context. Overall, public opinion toward military AI appears conditionally permissive. Publics are not categorically opposed to various military uses of AI. Instead, unease is concentrated around fully autonomous lethal force.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_25196
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Beyond Killer Robots: General AI Attitudes and Public Support for Military AI in Nine Countries
Jungherr, Andreas
Schlude, Antonia
Rauchfleisch, Adrian
Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
AI-enabled military systems are a fixture of modern military conflict. Applications vary from autonomous drones for surveillance and attack to AI-supported target selection. The importance of AI for modern conflict shows also in public disputes between governments and technology companies over the conditions for military access to frontier AI. Both military uses and government attempts at enabling and steering them happen before a backdrop of public opinion, yet we still know little about how people think about military AI. Drawing on a preregistered survey of 9,000 respondents in nine countries, including China, Germany, and the United States, we examine whether support for military AI is shaped primarily by general attitudes toward AI, principled opposition to lethal autonomy, or foreign-policy and geopolitical orientations. Across six military AI scenarios that vary in lethality and human control, respondents who view AI as beneficial are substantially more supportive of military AI. Hawkish respondents are also more supportive. By contrast, principled opposition to lethal autonomy is not broadly associated with the full index but is related to the application of fully autonomous lethal force. Contrary to our expectation, perceived AI risks are positively associated with support. Cross-national differences are moderate and broadly consistent with geopolitical context. Overall, public opinion toward military AI appears conditionally permissive. Publics are not categorically opposed to various military uses of AI. Instead, unease is concentrated around fully autonomous lethal force.
title Beyond Killer Robots: General AI Attitudes and Public Support for Military AI in Nine Countries
topic Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25196