Vectors Are Not Neutral: Sensitive-Information Inference from Exported LLM Representations in Summarization

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Liu, Weixin, Qu, Bowen, Xiong, Juming, Ni, Congning, Malin, Bradley A., Yin, Zhijun
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866914602427613184
author Liu, Weixin
Qu, Bowen
Xiong, Juming
Ni, Congning
Malin, Bradley A.
Yin, Zhijun
author_facet Liu, Weixin
Qu, Bowen
Xiong, Juming
Ni, Congning
Malin, Bradley A.
Yin, Zhijun
contents Large language model (LLM) summarization systems may pass compact vector representations of private inputs to downstream retrieval, monitoring, audit, or analytic workflows. Even when source documents remain access-restricted, derived vectors may be handled under different access controls and still support sensitive-information inference, creating a residual information-disclosure risk. We study this issue in clinical discharge-summary generation as a high-stakes case study, using electronic health record (EHR)-recorded race as a controlled sensitive-label audit. We audit two artifacts that a system might retain or expose to downstream components: the final prompt-token hidden state and the mean-pooled prompt representation. Our results show that reducing recoverability of the case-study sensitive label from one exported artifact does not necessarily reduce recoverability from another. As a mitigation case study, we introduce SurfaceLoRA, an exported-vector-targeted parameter-efficient fine-tuning method that uses a gradient-reversal discriminator attached to a designated exported vector. Under a balanced five-way probing protocol, SurfaceLoRA reduces EHR-recorded race recoverability from the targeted final-token artifact toward chance while preserving summarization utility, yet recoverability remains substantially higher from untargeted pooled artifacts. These findings show that privacy auditing and mitigation should be performed on the exact vector artifact retained or exposed to downstream components.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_26433
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Vectors Are Not Neutral: Sensitive-Information Inference from Exported LLM Representations in Summarization
Liu, Weixin
Qu, Bowen
Xiong, Juming
Ni, Congning
Malin, Bradley A.
Yin, Zhijun
Computation and Language
Large language model (LLM) summarization systems may pass compact vector representations of private inputs to downstream retrieval, monitoring, audit, or analytic workflows. Even when source documents remain access-restricted, derived vectors may be handled under different access controls and still support sensitive-information inference, creating a residual information-disclosure risk. We study this issue in clinical discharge-summary generation as a high-stakes case study, using electronic health record (EHR)-recorded race as a controlled sensitive-label audit. We audit two artifacts that a system might retain or expose to downstream components: the final prompt-token hidden state and the mean-pooled prompt representation. Our results show that reducing recoverability of the case-study sensitive label from one exported artifact does not necessarily reduce recoverability from another. As a mitigation case study, we introduce SurfaceLoRA, an exported-vector-targeted parameter-efficient fine-tuning method that uses a gradient-reversal discriminator attached to a designated exported vector. Under a balanced five-way probing protocol, SurfaceLoRA reduces EHR-recorded race recoverability from the targeted final-token artifact toward chance while preserving summarization utility, yet recoverability remains substantially higher from untargeted pooled artifacts. These findings show that privacy auditing and mitigation should be performed on the exact vector artifact retained or exposed to downstream components.
title Vectors Are Not Neutral: Sensitive-Information Inference from Exported LLM Representations in Summarization
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26433