Reasoning Depth and Environment Complexity: A Controlled Study of RLVR Data Allocation across Logical Reasoning Tasks

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhu, Yihua, Liu, Qianying, Cheng, Fei, Wang, Jiaxin, Aizawa, Akiko, Kurohashi, Sadao, Shimodaira, Hidetoshi
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911719999143936
author Zhu, Yihua
Liu, Qianying
Cheng, Fei
Wang, Jiaxin
Aizawa, Akiko
Kurohashi, Sadao
Shimodaira, Hidetoshi
author_facet Zhu, Yihua
Liu, Qianying
Cheng, Fei
Wang, Jiaxin
Aizawa, Akiko
Kurohashi, Sadao
Shimodaira, Hidetoshi
contents Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become central to post-training reasoning models, yet a key limitation of existing studies is their narrow view of the reasoning space: difficulty is treated as reasoning depth alone, and reward is concentrated on forward deductive state tracking. We instead characterize the reasoning space along two dimensions. Difficulty. Beyond reasoning depth, we study environment complexity, where models must identify the correct path amid distractors and interacting structures. Rewarded reasoning form. We consider four abilities core to real-world reasoning: deductive state tracking, abductive recovery of hidden events or facts, inductive rule induction, and analogical transfer. To disentangle these factors, we construct a synthetic knowledge-graph environment with controlled pre- and post-training distributions, where each instance varies along depth, complexity, and task family. Three findings emerge: joint depth-complexity coverage outperforms single-axis recipes; reasoning families respond non-uniformly, with abductive reasoning degrading outside the RL-covered region and task correlations clustering into deductive-abductive and inductive-analogy pairs; and uniform mixing outperforms staged curricula under a fixed budget. We also find that recent off-the-shelf models exhibit the same deductive-over-abductive asymmetry, suggesting that this gap is not merely an artifact of our controlled setup.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_26934
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Reasoning Depth and Environment Complexity: A Controlled Study of RLVR Data Allocation across Logical Reasoning Tasks
Zhu, Yihua
Liu, Qianying
Cheng, Fei
Wang, Jiaxin
Aizawa, Akiko
Kurohashi, Sadao
Shimodaira, Hidetoshi
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become central to post-training reasoning models, yet a key limitation of existing studies is their narrow view of the reasoning space: difficulty is treated as reasoning depth alone, and reward is concentrated on forward deductive state tracking. We instead characterize the reasoning space along two dimensions. Difficulty. Beyond reasoning depth, we study environment complexity, where models must identify the correct path amid distractors and interacting structures. Rewarded reasoning form. We consider four abilities core to real-world reasoning: deductive state tracking, abductive recovery of hidden events or facts, inductive rule induction, and analogical transfer. To disentangle these factors, we construct a synthetic knowledge-graph environment with controlled pre- and post-training distributions, where each instance varies along depth, complexity, and task family. Three findings emerge: joint depth-complexity coverage outperforms single-axis recipes; reasoning families respond non-uniformly, with abductive reasoning degrading outside the RL-covered region and task correlations clustering into deductive-abductive and inductive-analogy pairs; and uniform mixing outperforms staged curricula under a fixed budget. We also find that recent off-the-shelf models exhibit the same deductive-over-abductive asymmetry, suggesting that this gap is not merely an artifact of our controlled setup.
title Reasoning Depth and Environment Complexity: A Controlled Study of RLVR Data Allocation across Logical Reasoning Tasks
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26934