It's Not Always Sycophancy: Measuring LLM Conformity as a Function of Epistemic Uncertainty
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917536681951232 |
|---|---|
| author | Guo, Kevin H. Yan, Chao Baidya, Avinash Brown, Katherine Gao, Xiang Xiong, Juming Yin, Zhijun Malin, Bradley A. |
| author_facet | Guo, Kevin H. Yan, Chao Baidya, Avinash Brown, Katherine Gao, Xiang Xiong, Juming Yin, Zhijun Malin, Bradley A. |
| contents | Large language models (LLMs) are known to abandon their initial stance to conform to user pushback. While prior research largely attributes this behavior to sycophancy learned during reinforcement learning from human feedback, we hypothesize that conformity is also driven by a model's epistemic uncertainty at inference time. In this paper, we introduce MUSE, a two-stage evaluation framework to disentangle the mechanisms driving LLM conformity. Specifically, MUSE maps a model's epistemic uncertainty in responding to a query against its likelihood to yield to user pushback in a subsequent turn. We demonstrate that the mechanisms driving conformity extend beyond sycophancy alone. Specifically, we characterize two distinct factors that jointly drive conformity: sycophantic conformity, where a model aligns with user pushback even with absolute certainty in its initial response, and uncertainty-driven conformity, where a model's likelihood for conformity increases alongside its uncertainty. Furthermore, we conduct ablation studies to demonstrate that both sycophantic conformity and uncertainty-driven conformity grow with 1) the LLM's perceived expertise of the user and 2) the plausibility of the user's suggestions. More broadly, MUSE informs more targeted intervention strategies by distinguishing alignment-induced sycophancy and training-corpora-driven uncertainty. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_27288 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | It's Not Always Sycophancy: Measuring LLM Conformity as a Function of Epistemic Uncertainty Guo, Kevin H. Yan, Chao Baidya, Avinash Brown, Katherine Gao, Xiang Xiong, Juming Yin, Zhijun Malin, Bradley A. Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Large language models (LLMs) are known to abandon their initial stance to conform to user pushback. While prior research largely attributes this behavior to sycophancy learned during reinforcement learning from human feedback, we hypothesize that conformity is also driven by a model's epistemic uncertainty at inference time. In this paper, we introduce MUSE, a two-stage evaluation framework to disentangle the mechanisms driving LLM conformity. Specifically, MUSE maps a model's epistemic uncertainty in responding to a query against its likelihood to yield to user pushback in a subsequent turn. We demonstrate that the mechanisms driving conformity extend beyond sycophancy alone. Specifically, we characterize two distinct factors that jointly drive conformity: sycophantic conformity, where a model aligns with user pushback even with absolute certainty in its initial response, and uncertainty-driven conformity, where a model's likelihood for conformity increases alongside its uncertainty. Furthermore, we conduct ablation studies to demonstrate that both sycophantic conformity and uncertainty-driven conformity grow with 1) the LLM's perceived expertise of the user and 2) the plausibility of the user's suggestions. More broadly, MUSE informs more targeted intervention strategies by distinguishing alignment-induced sycophancy and training-corpora-driven uncertainty. |
| title | It's Not Always Sycophancy: Measuring LLM Conformity as a Function of Epistemic Uncertainty |
| topic | Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27288 |