Structuring Human-AI Productive Interdependence by Strategic Level of Automation Selection for Qualitative Inquiry
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866913165770489856 |
|---|---|
| author | Zhou, Feng Meijer-Irons, Jacqueline Murillo, Ambar |
| author_facet | Zhou, Feng Meijer-Irons, Jacqueline Murillo, Ambar |
| contents | While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a solution to the scale-versus-depth dilemma in qualitative analysis, the paradigm of maximizing automation is fundamentally at odds with the interpretive nature of qualitative inquiry. We argue that effective Human-AI collaboration is not an automation problem, but an interdependence problem. This paper reframes the design of "co-data" systems through the lens of Interdependence Theory, proposing a formal framework to structure human-AI productive interdependence. The framework guides the selection of an appropriate Level of Automation (LoA) for different stages of the qualitative analysis process by assessing task risk and the cost of validation. We present a case study where this framework led to a deliberately interdependent workflow, fostering the calibrated trust necessary for rigorous analysis. We conclude by presenting three design principles that instantiate this framework, demonstrating how to leverage AI as a powerful partner while preserving the human researcher's irreplaceable role in the transformation process of meaning-making. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_27634 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Structuring Human-AI Productive Interdependence by Strategic Level of Automation Selection for Qualitative Inquiry Zhou, Feng Meijer-Irons, Jacqueline Murillo, Ambar Human-Computer Interaction While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a solution to the scale-versus-depth dilemma in qualitative analysis, the paradigm of maximizing automation is fundamentally at odds with the interpretive nature of qualitative inquiry. We argue that effective Human-AI collaboration is not an automation problem, but an interdependence problem. This paper reframes the design of "co-data" systems through the lens of Interdependence Theory, proposing a formal framework to structure human-AI productive interdependence. The framework guides the selection of an appropriate Level of Automation (LoA) for different stages of the qualitative analysis process by assessing task risk and the cost of validation. We present a case study where this framework led to a deliberately interdependent workflow, fostering the calibrated trust necessary for rigorous analysis. We conclude by presenting three design principles that instantiate this framework, demonstrating how to leverage AI as a powerful partner while preserving the human researcher's irreplaceable role in the transformation process of meaning-making. |
| title | Structuring Human-AI Productive Interdependence by Strategic Level of Automation Selection for Qualitative Inquiry |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27634 |