Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27734 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866913166071431168 |
|---|---|
| author | Korchinski, Daniel J. Favero, Alessandro Wyart, Matthieu |
| author_facet | Korchinski, Daniel J. Favero, Alessandro Wyart, Matthieu |
| contents | Generative models, from diffusion models to large language models, achieve remarkable performance but at a cost in training data orders of magnitude larger than what biological learners require. An alternative paradigm has emerged in which networks are trained to predict their \emph{own} latent representations of related views or masked regions, as in data2vec and JEPA -- an idea related to predictive-coding accounts of the cortex. Despite strong empirical results, the theoretical understanding of these methods remains limited. Central questions include: by how much does latent prediction actually improve data efficiency? Is there a benefit to stacking such methods into multi-scale hierarchies? We answer both using as data a tractable probabilistic context-free grammar that captures the compositional structure of natural language and images. Such a grammar generates strings of visible tokens by recursively applying production rules along a tree of hidden symbols of depth $L$. For such data, supervised or token-level SSL require a number of samples \emph{exponential} in $L$ to recover the latent tree; we prove that latent prediction achieves this with a number of samples \emph{constant} in $L$, up to logarithmic factors. We confirm this bound with (i) a hierarchical clustering algorithm, (ii) an end-to-end neural network whose predictor-clusterer modules predict their own latents at each level via gradient descent, and (iii) the first sample-complexity analysis of data2vec, which we show implicitly performs hierarchical latent prediction. This suggests that explicit stacking such as H-JEPA is largely redundant. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_27734 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Learn from your own latents and not from tokens: A sample-complexity theory Korchinski, Daniel J. Favero, Alessandro Wyart, Matthieu Machine Learning Generative models, from diffusion models to large language models, achieve remarkable performance but at a cost in training data orders of magnitude larger than what biological learners require. An alternative paradigm has emerged in which networks are trained to predict their \emph{own} latent representations of related views or masked regions, as in data2vec and JEPA -- an idea related to predictive-coding accounts of the cortex. Despite strong empirical results, the theoretical understanding of these methods remains limited. Central questions include: by how much does latent prediction actually improve data efficiency? Is there a benefit to stacking such methods into multi-scale hierarchies? We answer both using as data a tractable probabilistic context-free grammar that captures the compositional structure of natural language and images. Such a grammar generates strings of visible tokens by recursively applying production rules along a tree of hidden symbols of depth $L$. For such data, supervised or token-level SSL require a number of samples \emph{exponential} in $L$ to recover the latent tree; we prove that latent prediction achieves this with a number of samples \emph{constant} in $L$, up to logarithmic factors. We confirm this bound with (i) a hierarchical clustering algorithm, (ii) an end-to-end neural network whose predictor-clusterer modules predict their own latents at each level via gradient descent, and (iii) the first sample-complexity analysis of data2vec, which we show implicitly performs hierarchical latent prediction. This suggests that explicit stacking such as H-JEPA is largely redundant. |
| title | Learn from your own latents and not from tokens: A sample-complexity theory |
| topic | Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27734 |