Counterexamples to Clique Immersion Conjecture for Direct Products

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Wu, Chuanshu, Deng, Zijian
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866911726036844544
author Wu, Chuanshu
Deng, Zijian
author_facet Wu, Chuanshu
Deng, Zijian
contents Let \(G\) and \(H\) be graphs, and let \(G\times H\) denote their direct product. For a graph \(G\), let \(\operatorname{im}(G)\) be the largest integer \(t\) such that \(G\) contains a \(K_t\)-immersion. Collins, Heenehan, and McDonald conjectured that if \(\operatorname{im}(G)=t\) and \(\operatorname{im}(H)=r\), then \[\operatorname{im}(G\times H)\ge (t-1)(r-1)+1.\] We disprove this conjecture by constructing an infinite family of connected bipartite counterexamples.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_28518
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Counterexamples to Clique Immersion Conjecture for Direct Products
Wu, Chuanshu
Deng, Zijian
Combinatorics
Let \(G\) and \(H\) be graphs, and let \(G\times H\) denote their direct product. For a graph \(G\), let \(\operatorname{im}(G)\) be the largest integer \(t\) such that \(G\) contains a \(K_t\)-immersion. Collins, Heenehan, and McDonald conjectured that if \(\operatorname{im}(G)=t\) and \(\operatorname{im}(H)=r\), then \[\operatorname{im}(G\times H)\ge (t-1)(r-1)+1.\] We disprove this conjecture by constructing an infinite family of connected bipartite counterexamples.
title Counterexamples to Clique Immersion Conjecture for Direct Products
topic Combinatorics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28518