Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29396 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866918528949420032 |
|---|---|
| author | Liu, Zhihao Wu, Yifan Lou, Jian Wang, Di Zhou, Yuxi Hu, Yuke |
| author_facet | Liu, Zhihao Wu, Yifan Lou, Jian Wang, Di Zhou, Yuxi Hu, Yuke |
| contents | Safety alignment for large language models (LLMs) aims to reduce harmful or unsafe behavior while preserving general utility. However, recent findings reveal that alignment effects can be fragile: lightweight post-alignment manipulations, such as parameter noise, activation noise, or quantization, can easily weaken the intended safety behavior. Prior efforts to improve robustness have primarily focused on data curation, modified alignment objectives, and safety-critical parameter identification, leaving the role of the optimizer itself largely unexplored.
In this paper, we are the first to study the robustness of safety alignment from the perspective of the base optimizer. This optimizer-centric view naturally points to zeroth-order optimization, which provides a robustness-oriented signal by evaluating safety alignment under perturbations. Based on this insight, we propose a hybrid framework that first performs standard first-order safety alignment and then applies zeroth-order refinement to improve robustness. Both theoretically and empirically, we show that only a few zeroth-order refinement steps can enhance robustness while preserving safety alignment. We further improve the efficiency of zeroth-order refinement by exploiting its inherent perturbation-based evaluations to estimate layer-wise robustness sensitivity, enabling the refinement process to concentrate updates on robustness-critical layers with modest training overhead. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_29396 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Aligned but Fragile: Enhancing LLM Safety Robustness via Zeroth-Order Optimization Liu, Zhihao Wu, Yifan Lou, Jian Wang, Di Zhou, Yuxi Hu, Yuke Artificial Intelligence Safety alignment for large language models (LLMs) aims to reduce harmful or unsafe behavior while preserving general utility. However, recent findings reveal that alignment effects can be fragile: lightweight post-alignment manipulations, such as parameter noise, activation noise, or quantization, can easily weaken the intended safety behavior. Prior efforts to improve robustness have primarily focused on data curation, modified alignment objectives, and safety-critical parameter identification, leaving the role of the optimizer itself largely unexplored. In this paper, we are the first to study the robustness of safety alignment from the perspective of the base optimizer. This optimizer-centric view naturally points to zeroth-order optimization, which provides a robustness-oriented signal by evaluating safety alignment under perturbations. Based on this insight, we propose a hybrid framework that first performs standard first-order safety alignment and then applies zeroth-order refinement to improve robustness. Both theoretically and empirically, we show that only a few zeroth-order refinement steps can enhance robustness while preserving safety alignment. We further improve the efficiency of zeroth-order refinement by exploiting its inherent perturbation-based evaluations to estimate layer-wise robustness sensitivity, enabling the refinement process to concentrate updates on robustness-critical layers with modest training overhead. |
| title | Aligned but Fragile: Enhancing LLM Safety Robustness via Zeroth-Order Optimization |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29396 |