Singularity-aware Optimization via Randomized Geometric Probing: Towards Stable Non-smooth Optimization
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866911726905065472 |
|---|---|
| author | Xu, Ruoran She, Borong Jin, Xiaobo Wang, Qiufeng |
| author_facet | Xu, Ruoran She, Borong Jin, Xiaobo Wang, Qiufeng |
| contents | Deep learning optimization relies heavily on the assumption of smooth loss landscapes, a condition systematically violated by modern architectures due to non-smooth components such as ReLU activations and quantization operators. In such non-smooth regimes, adaptive optimizers such as Adam suffer from gradient chattering, violent oscillations caused by conflicting signals within the Clarke subdifferential, leading to poor convergence and suboptimal generalization. To address this, we introduce Singularity-aware Adam (S-Adam), a novel optimizer that stabilizes training by dynamically modulating step sizes based on local geometric instability. Our key contribution is the Local Geometric Instability (LGI) metric, a computationally efficient estimator of the Clarke subdifferential diameter derived from the variance of randomized directional derivatives. S-Adam incorporates an adaptive damping mechanism exp(-$λ$$ρ$) that decelerates updates in high-instability regions while preserving fast convergence in smooth basins. We provide a rigorous convergence analysis using differential inclusions, proving that S-Adam converges almost surely to ($δ$,$ε$)-Clarke stationary points at the optimal O(1/$\sqrt(T)$) rate. Empirical evaluations on Quantization-Aware Training (QAT) and high-noise small-batch learning demonstrate that S-Adam consistently outperforms AdamW and Prox-SGD, achieving accuracy gains of up to 6 percent on CIFAR-100 and 3 percent on TinyImageNet while effectively mitigating gradient oscillations. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_29547 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Singularity-aware Optimization via Randomized Geometric Probing: Towards Stable Non-smooth Optimization Xu, Ruoran She, Borong Jin, Xiaobo Wang, Qiufeng Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence Optimization and Control 68T05, 68W40, 90C30 F.2.2; I.2.6; I.2.7 Deep learning optimization relies heavily on the assumption of smooth loss landscapes, a condition systematically violated by modern architectures due to non-smooth components such as ReLU activations and quantization operators. In such non-smooth regimes, adaptive optimizers such as Adam suffer from gradient chattering, violent oscillations caused by conflicting signals within the Clarke subdifferential, leading to poor convergence and suboptimal generalization. To address this, we introduce Singularity-aware Adam (S-Adam), a novel optimizer that stabilizes training by dynamically modulating step sizes based on local geometric instability. Our key contribution is the Local Geometric Instability (LGI) metric, a computationally efficient estimator of the Clarke subdifferential diameter derived from the variance of randomized directional derivatives. S-Adam incorporates an adaptive damping mechanism exp(-$λ$$ρ$) that decelerates updates in high-instability regions while preserving fast convergence in smooth basins. We provide a rigorous convergence analysis using differential inclusions, proving that S-Adam converges almost surely to ($δ$,$ε$)-Clarke stationary points at the optimal O(1/$\sqrt(T)$) rate. Empirical evaluations on Quantization-Aware Training (QAT) and high-noise small-batch learning demonstrate that S-Adam consistently outperforms AdamW and Prox-SGD, achieving accuracy gains of up to 6 percent on CIFAR-100 and 3 percent on TinyImageNet while effectively mitigating gradient oscillations. |
| title | Singularity-aware Optimization via Randomized Geometric Probing: Towards Stable Non-smooth Optimization |
| topic | Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence Optimization and Control 68T05, 68W40, 90C30 F.2.2; I.2.6; I.2.7 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29547 |