Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu, Yeyong, Hu, Wenya, Wu, Xing, Qian, Quan
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29555
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910269154787328
author Yu, Yeyong
Hu, Wenya
Wu, Xing
Qian, Quan
author_facet Yu, Yeyong
Hu, Wenya
Wu, Xing
Qian, Quan
contents As candidate generation and high-throughput experimentation advance, the primary bottleneck in materials discovery is shifting from property prediction to making reliable evaluations among massive candidate sets. We propose a Knowledge-Augmented Preference Signals Framework, MaterEval, that automatically produces, for the same candidate, two evaluations: an informed judgment that follows expert rules and provides supporting evidence, and a rule-removed blind guess. By pairing the two evaluations as preference data, we guide general-purpose large language models (LLMs), originally lacking materials-specific criteria, from intuitive judgment toward reliable evaluation supported by explicit evidence. To balance throughput, cost, and reliability, we further introduce a fast-slow reasoning scheme that decouples large-scale rapid screening from in-depth review on a small subset. Using high-entropy alloy (HEA) assessment as a case study, we show that, without external retrieval and relying solely on internalized capabilities, small open-source LLMs achieve substantial gains in accuracy, conclusion consistency, and evidence discrimination, approaching the performance of rule-based closed-source LLMs. These results demonstrate that expert rules can be systematically transformed into learnable preference signals, enabling a low-cost and deployable evaluation module for autonomous materials discovery loops.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_29555
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle From Blind Guess to Informed Judgment: Teaching LLMs to Evaluate Materials by Building Knowledge-Augmented Preference Signals
Yu, Yeyong
Hu, Wenya
Wu, Xing
Qian, Quan
Computation and Language
As candidate generation and high-throughput experimentation advance, the primary bottleneck in materials discovery is shifting from property prediction to making reliable evaluations among massive candidate sets. We propose a Knowledge-Augmented Preference Signals Framework, MaterEval, that automatically produces, for the same candidate, two evaluations: an informed judgment that follows expert rules and provides supporting evidence, and a rule-removed blind guess. By pairing the two evaluations as preference data, we guide general-purpose large language models (LLMs), originally lacking materials-specific criteria, from intuitive judgment toward reliable evaluation supported by explicit evidence. To balance throughput, cost, and reliability, we further introduce a fast-slow reasoning scheme that decouples large-scale rapid screening from in-depth review on a small subset. Using high-entropy alloy (HEA) assessment as a case study, we show that, without external retrieval and relying solely on internalized capabilities, small open-source LLMs achieve substantial gains in accuracy, conclusion consistency, and evidence discrimination, approaching the performance of rule-based closed-source LLMs. These results demonstrate that expert rules can be systematically transformed into learnable preference signals, enabling a low-cost and deployable evaluation module for autonomous materials discovery loops.
title From Blind Guess to Informed Judgment: Teaching LLMs to Evaluate Materials by Building Knowledge-Augmented Preference Signals
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29555