:: Library Catalog

Cover Image

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Żurawicki, Krzysztof, Farganus, Julia, Gaweł, Arkadiusz, Bystroński, Mateusz, Kajdanowicz, Tomasz Jan
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2026
Subjects:	Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language
Online Access:	https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29815
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Learning Representations from 3D Gaussian Splats
by: Farganus, Julia, et al.
Published: (2026)

Geometry of Knowledge Allows Extending Diversity Boundaries of Large Language Models
by: Bystroński, Mateusz, et al.
Published: (2025)

LatentPrompt: Optimizing Promts in Latent Space
by: Bystroński, Mateusz, et al.
Published: (2025)

SMOTExT: SMOTE meets Large Language Models
by: Bystroński, Mateusz, et al.
Published: (2025)

Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Benchmarking AI Text Detection in Peer Review
by: Yu, Sungduk, et al.
Published: (2025)

Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Investigating AI Text Detectability in Peer Review
by: Yu, Sungduk, et al.
Published: (2024)

Hidden Prompts in Manuscripts Exploit AI-Assisted Peer Review
by: Lin, Zhicheng
Published: (2025)

Empowering Small-Scale Knowledge Graphs: A Strategy of Leveraging General-Purpose Knowledge Graphs for Enriched Embeddings
by: Sawczyn, Albert, et al.
Published: (2024)

Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future
by: Wu, Sihong, et al.
Published: (2026)

Hallucination Detection in LLMs Using Spectral Features of Attention Maps
by: Binkowski, Jakub, et al.
Published: (2025)

FactSelfCheck: Fact-Level Black-Box Hallucination Detection for LLMs
by: Sawczyn, Albert, et al.
Published: (2025)

ReviewerToo: Should AI Join The Program Committee? A Look At The Future of Peer Review
by: Sahu, Gaurav, et al.
Published: (2025)

Is Peer-Reviewing Worth the Effort?
by: Church, Kenneth, et al.
Published: (2024)

LLM Review: Enhancing Creative Writing via Blind Peer Review Feedback
by: Li, Weiyue, et al.
Published: (2026)

EchoReview: Learning Peer Review from the Echoes of Scientific Citations
by: Zhang, Yinuo, et al.
Published: (2026)

The Illusion of Progress: Re-evaluating Hallucination Detection in LLMs
by: Janiak, Denis, et al.
Published: (2025)

The Knowledge-Behaviour Disconnect in LLM-based Chatbots
by: Broersen, Jan
Published: (2025)

When Reviews Disagree: Fine-Grained Contradiction Analysis in Scientific Peer Reviews
by: Kumar, Sandeep, et al.
Published: (2026)

Policies Permitting LLM Use for Polishing Peer Reviews Are Currently Not Enforceable
by: Saha, Rounak, et al.
Published: (2026)

Developing PUGG for Polish: A Modern Approach to KBQA, MRC, and IR Dataset Construction
by: Sawczyn, Albert, et al.
Published: (2024)

CoCoReviewBench: A Completeness- and Correctness-Oriented Benchmark for AI Reviewers
by: Deng, Hexuan, et al.
Published: (2026)

Detecting AI-Generated Content in Academic Peer Reviews
by: Shen, Siyuan, et al.
Published: (2026)

Backtranslation and paraphrasing in the LLM era? Comparing data augmentation methods for emotion classification
by: Radliński, Łukasz, et al.
Published: (2025)

PeerQA: A Scientific Question Answering Dataset from Peer Reviews
by: Baumgärtner, Tim, et al.
Published: (2025)

DeepReviewer 2.0: A Traceable Agentic System for Auditable Scientific Peer Review
by: Weng, Yixuan, et al.
Published: (2026)

Breaking the Reviewer: Assessing the Vulnerability of Large Language Models in Automated Peer Review Under Textual Adversarial Attacks
by: Lin, Tzu-Ling, et al.
Published: (2025)

CoCoNUTS: Concentrating on Content while Neglecting Uninformative Textual Styles for AI-Generated Peer Review Detection
by: Chen, Yihan, et al.
Published: (2025)

REM-CTX: Automated Peer Review via Reinforcement Learning with Auxiliary Context
by: Taechoyotin, Pawin, et al.
Published: (2026)

The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authors
by: Sadallah, Abdelrahman, et al.
Published: (2025)

Learning from Committee: Reasoning Distillation from a Mixture of Teachers with Peer-Review
by: Li, Zhuochun, et al.
Published: (2024)

PiCO: Peer Review in LLMs based on the Consistency Optimization
by: Ning, Kun-Peng, et al.
Published: (2024)

ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews
by: Garg, Madhav Krishan, et al.
Published: (2025)

The LLM Fallacy: Misattribution in AI-Assisted Cognitive Workflows
by: Kim, Hyunwoo, et al.
Published: (2026)

Position on LLM-Assisted Peer Review: Addressing Reviewer Gap through Mentoring and Feedback
by: Yun, JungMin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Modeling LLM Agent Reviewer Dynamics in Elo-Ranked Review System
by: Huang, Hsiang-Wei, et al.
Published: (2026)

On the Importance and Evaluation of Narrativity in Natural Language AI Explanations
by: Cedro, Mateusz, et al.
Published: (2026)

Scoring, Reasoning, and Selecting the Best! Ensembling Large Language Models via a Peer-Review Process
by: Chen, Zhijun, et al.
Published: (2025)

Personalized Large Language Models
by: Woźniak, Stanisław, et al.
Published: (2024)

LLM Agents Implement an NLG System from Scratch: Building Interpretable Rule-Based RDF-to-Text Generators
by: Lango, Mateusz, et al.
Published: (2025)

LLM-REVal: Can We Trust LLM Reviewers Yet?
by: Li, Rui, et al.
Published: (2025)