Cover Image

CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Zhao, Ethan, Taranukhin, Maksym, Cui, Wei, Aikenhead, Moira, Shwartz, Vered
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2026
Subjects:	Computation and Language
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Stance Reasoner: Zero-Shot Stance Detection on Social Media with Explicit Reasoning
by: Taranukhin, Maksym, et al.
Published: (2024)

Empowering Air Travelers: A Chatbot for Canadian Air Passenger Rights
by: Taranukhin, Maksym, et al.
Published: (2024)

InfoGatherer: Principled Information Seeking via Evidence Retrieval and Strategic Questioning
by: Taranukhin, Maksym, et al.
Published: (2026)

RAGBench: Explainable Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
by: Friel, Robert, et al.
Published: (2024)

LIT-RAGBench: Benchmarking Generator Capabilities of Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
by: Itai, Koki, et al.
Published: (2026)

LRAGE: Legal Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation Tool
by: Park, Minhu, et al.
Published: (2025)

CLERC: A Dataset for Legal Case Retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Analysis Generation
by: Hou, Abe Bohan, et al.
Published: (2024)

BottleHumor: Self-Informed Humor Explanation using the Information Bottleneck Principle
by: Hwang, EunJeong, et al.
Published: (2025)

Legal-DC: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Legal Documents
by: Li, Yaocong, et al.
Published: (2026)

Locating Information Gaps and Narrative Inconsistencies Across Languages: A Case Study of LGBT People Portrayals on Wikipedia
by: Samir, Farhan, et al.
Published: (2024)

FinRAGBench-V: A Benchmark for Multimodal RAG with Visual Citation in the Financial Domain
by: Zhao, Suifeng, et al.
Published: (2025)

From Local Concepts to Universals: Evaluating the Multicultural Understanding of Vision-Language Models
by: Bhatia, Mehar, et al.
Published: (2024)

How Vital is the Jurisprudential Relevance: Law Article Intervened Legal Case Retrieval and Matching
by: Xu, Nuo, et al.
Published: (2025)

ASVRI-Legal: Fine-Tuning LLMs with Retrieval Augmented Generation for Enhanced Legal Regulation
by: Octadion, One, et al.
Published: (2025)

Efficiently Identifying Low-Quality Language Subsets in Multilingual Datasets: A Case Study on a Large-Scale Multilingual Audio Dataset
by: Samir, Farhan, et al.
Published: (2024)

LegalSearchLM: Rethinking Legal Case Retrieval as Legal Elements Generation
by: Kim, Chaeeun, et al.
Published: (2025)

Is It Bad to Work All the Time? Cross-Cultural Evaluation of Social Norm Biases in GPT-4
by: Liu, Zhuozhuo Joy, et al.
Published: (2025)

CBR-RAG: Case-Based Reasoning for Retrieval Augmented Generation in LLMs for Legal Question Answering
by: Wiratunga, Nirmalie, et al.
Published: (2024)

PILOT: Legal Case Outcome Prediction with Case Law
by: Cao, Lang, et al.
Published: (2024)

LegalGraphRAG: Multi-Agent Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Reliable Legal Reasoning
by: Chen, Zerui, et al.
Published: (2026)

Infusing Theory of Mind into Socially Intelligent LLM Agents
by: Hwang, EunJeong, et al.
Published: (2025)

Retrieving, Rethinking and Revising: The Chain-of-Verification Can Improve Retrieval Augmented Generation
by: He, Bolei, et al.
Published: (2024)

SPIKE-RL: Video-LLMs meet Bayesian Surprise
by: Ravi, Sahithya, et al.
Published: (2025)

RARE: Retrieval-Aware Robustness Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
by: Zeng, Yixiao, et al.
Published: (2025)

MSRS: Evaluating Multi-Source Retrieval-Augmented Generation
by: Phanse, Rohan, et al.
Published: (2025)

LLMs are Biased Evaluators But Not Biased for Retrieval Augmented Generation
by: Chen, Yen-Shan, et al.
Published: (2024)

Generating Legal Commentaries from Case Databases via Retrieval, Clustering, and Generation
by: Prior, Max, et al.
Published: (2026)

Unanswerability Evaluation for Retrieval Augmented Generation
by: Peng, Xiangyu, et al.
Published: (2024)

T$^2$-RAGBench: Text-and-Table Benchmark for Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation
by: Strich, Jan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Automating Legal Interpretation with LLMs: Retrieval, Generation, and Evaluation
by: Luo, Kangcheng, et al.
Published: (2025)

Evaluating Retrieval Quality in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
by: Salemi, Alireza, et al.
Published: (2024)

Think-then-Act: A Dual-Angle Evaluated Retrieval-Augmented Generation
by: Shen, Yige, et al.
Published: (2024)

Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation
by: Es, Shahul, et al.
Published: (2023)

PL-CA: A Parametric Legal Case Augmentation Framework
by: Chang, Ao, et al.
Published: (2025)

WikiGap: Promoting Epistemic Equity by Surfacing Knowledge Gaps Between English Wikipedia and other Language Editions
by: Wang, Zining, et al.
Published: (2025)

Bridging Information Gaps with Comprehensive Answers: Improving the Diversity and Informativeness of Follow-Up Questions
by: Liu, Zhe, et al.
Published: (2025)

CodeRAG-Bench: Can Retrieval Augment Code Generation?
by: Wang, Zora Zhiruo, et al.
Published: (2024)

NyayaAI: An AI-Powered Legal Assistant Using Multi-Agent Architecture and Retrieval-Augmented Generation
by: Deepanshu, et al.
Published: (2026)

Team ACK at SemEval-2025 Task 2: Beyond Word-for-Word Machine Translation for English-Korean Pairs
by: Lee, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2025)

LexRAG: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Multi-Turn Legal Consultation Conversation
by: Li, Haitao, et al.
Published: (2025)