Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30612 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866916063784992768 |
|---|---|
| author | Shamass, Faiq |
| author_facet | Shamass, Faiq |
| contents | Continuous control policies trained with off-policy reinforcement learning frequently exhibit high-frequency action jitter, rendering direct deployment on physical actuators impractical. Post-hoc filtering attenuates jitter but introduces phase lag; embedding smoothness penalties in the actor's loss couples them with the RL gradient and conflates reward regression with over-aggressive smoothing. We present ZAPS-DA, a framework that reduces action jitter at deployment with negligible phase lag and no post-processing. ZAPS-DA pairs an unmodified main actor (trained by the base RL loss) with a separate decoupled actor trained via supervised imitation of zero-phase filtered targets stored in the replay buffer. The deployed policy is the decoupled actor: a feed-forward map from the current observation to a smooth action, with no inference-time filter and no action-history input -- a mechanism we term causal distillation of a non-causal filter. A magnitude-matched MSE loss provides zero-hyperparameter portability across optimizer classes. Validated with Soft Actor-Critic and a Savitzky--Golay filter in two driving simulators using paired n=150 evaluation protocols: on MetaDrive, ZAPS-DA reduces steering jitter by 14--21x and throttle jitter by 3--5x (all $p < 10^{-4}$, Bonferroni-corrected) while matching task-completion (p=0.28 success, p=0.31 crash) at a 6.3% reward cost; on a custom Webots adaptive cruise control environment, the same SG configuration produces a Pareto improvement -- reward parity (p=0.121), 8--45x steering jitter reduction, and total task-failure rate reduced from 2.0% to 0.7%. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_30612 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | ZAPS-DA: Zero-Phase Action Policy Smoothing with Decoupled Actor for Continuous Control in Reinforcement Learning Shamass, Faiq Robotics Machine Learning Systems and Control I.2.6; I.2.9 Continuous control policies trained with off-policy reinforcement learning frequently exhibit high-frequency action jitter, rendering direct deployment on physical actuators impractical. Post-hoc filtering attenuates jitter but introduces phase lag; embedding smoothness penalties in the actor's loss couples them with the RL gradient and conflates reward regression with over-aggressive smoothing. We present ZAPS-DA, a framework that reduces action jitter at deployment with negligible phase lag and no post-processing. ZAPS-DA pairs an unmodified main actor (trained by the base RL loss) with a separate decoupled actor trained via supervised imitation of zero-phase filtered targets stored in the replay buffer. The deployed policy is the decoupled actor: a feed-forward map from the current observation to a smooth action, with no inference-time filter and no action-history input -- a mechanism we term causal distillation of a non-causal filter. A magnitude-matched MSE loss provides zero-hyperparameter portability across optimizer classes. Validated with Soft Actor-Critic and a Savitzky--Golay filter in two driving simulators using paired n=150 evaluation protocols: on MetaDrive, ZAPS-DA reduces steering jitter by 14--21x and throttle jitter by 3--5x (all $p < 10^{-4}$, Bonferroni-corrected) while matching task-completion (p=0.28 success, p=0.31 crash) at a 6.3% reward cost; on a custom Webots adaptive cruise control environment, the same SG configuration produces a Pareto improvement -- reward parity (p=0.121), 8--45x steering jitter reduction, and total task-failure rate reduced from 2.0% to 0.7%. |
| title | ZAPS-DA: Zero-Phase Action Policy Smoothing with Decoupled Actor for Continuous Control in Reinforcement Learning |
| topic | Robotics Machine Learning Systems and Control I.2.6; I.2.9 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30612 |