Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30621 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866916063803867136 |
|---|---|
| author | Lin, Minhua Wu, Juncheng Wang, Zijun Shi, Zhan Sang, Yisi He, Bing Liu, Zewen Wei, Tianxin Wu, Zongyu Zhang, Zhiwei Wang, Dakuo Zhang, Xiang Dumoulin, Benoit Xie, Cihang Zhou, Yuyin Wang, Suhang Lu, Hanqing |
| author_facet | Lin, Minhua Wu, Juncheng Wang, Zijun Shi, Zhan Sang, Yisi He, Bing Liu, Zewen Wei, Tianxin Wu, Zongyu Zhang, Zhiwei Wang, Dakuo Zhang, Xiang Dumoulin, Benoit Xie, Cihang Zhou, Yuyin Wang, Suhang Lu, Hanqing |
| contents | LLM agents are increasingly deployed as systems built around editable external harnesses, including prompts, skills, memories and tools, that shape task execution without changing model parameters. Harness self-evolution adapts such agents by updating these harnesses from execution evidence. Yet it remains unclear whether a model's base capability in task-solving predicts its capabilities in harness self-evolution: which models produce useful harness updates, and which actually benefit from them? We analyze two harness self-evolution capabilities: (i) harness-updating, the capability to produce useful persistent harness updates from execution evidence; (ii) harness-benefit, the capability to benefit from updated harnesses during task solving. Our analysis reveals two findings. First, harness-updating is flat in base capability: models from different capability tiers produce harness updates that lead to surprisingly similar gains; even Qwen3.5-9B's updates yield gains comparable to those of Claude Opus~4.6. Second, harness-benefit is non-monotonic in base capability: weak-tier models benefit little from updated harnesses, mid-tier models benefit most, and strong-tier models benefit less than mid-tier. We trace low gains at the weak tier to two failure modes: weak-tier models may fail to activate relevant harness artifacts, or activate them but fail to follow them faithfully. These findings suggest investing capability budget in the task-solving agent rather than the evolver, and targeting harness invocation and long-horizon instruction following in agent training. Our source code is publicly available at https://github.com/A-EVO-Lab/a-evolve/tree/release/harness-evolution. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_30621 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Harness Updating Is Not Harness Benefit: Disentangling Evolution Capabilities in Self-Evolving LLM Agents Lin, Minhua Wu, Juncheng Wang, Zijun Shi, Zhan Sang, Yisi He, Bing Liu, Zewen Wei, Tianxin Wu, Zongyu Zhang, Zhiwei Wang, Dakuo Zhang, Xiang Dumoulin, Benoit Xie, Cihang Zhou, Yuyin Wang, Suhang Lu, Hanqing Artificial Intelligence LLM agents are increasingly deployed as systems built around editable external harnesses, including prompts, skills, memories and tools, that shape task execution without changing model parameters. Harness self-evolution adapts such agents by updating these harnesses from execution evidence. Yet it remains unclear whether a model's base capability in task-solving predicts its capabilities in harness self-evolution: which models produce useful harness updates, and which actually benefit from them? We analyze two harness self-evolution capabilities: (i) harness-updating, the capability to produce useful persistent harness updates from execution evidence; (ii) harness-benefit, the capability to benefit from updated harnesses during task solving. Our analysis reveals two findings. First, harness-updating is flat in base capability: models from different capability tiers produce harness updates that lead to surprisingly similar gains; even Qwen3.5-9B's updates yield gains comparable to those of Claude Opus~4.6. Second, harness-benefit is non-monotonic in base capability: weak-tier models benefit little from updated harnesses, mid-tier models benefit most, and strong-tier models benefit less than mid-tier. We trace low gains at the weak tier to two failure modes: weak-tier models may fail to activate relevant harness artifacts, or activate them but fail to follow them faithfully. These findings suggest investing capability budget in the task-solving agent rather than the evolver, and targeting harness invocation and long-horizon instruction following in agent training. Our source code is publicly available at https://github.com/A-EVO-Lab/a-evolve/tree/release/harness-evolution. |
| title | Harness Updating Is Not Harness Benefit: Disentangling Evolution Capabilities in Self-Evolving LLM Agents |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30621 |