Used Car Salesbots? Honesty and Credulity of LLMs as Bargaining Agents under Partial Information

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Miceli-Barone, Antonio Valerio, Belle, Vaishak, Cohen, Shay B.
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866917548157566976
author Miceli-Barone, Antonio Valerio
Belle, Vaishak
Cohen, Shay B.
author_facet Miceli-Barone, Antonio Valerio
Belle, Vaishak
Cohen, Shay B.
contents In this work we study agents in simulated bargaining scenarios, where a buyer and a seller communicate through a text channel and attempt to negotiate mutually beneficial trades, under different information regimes (complete information, information asymmetry or mutual uncertainty). We evaluate their performance w.r.t. game-theoretical solutions and further investigate their honesty (their tendency to disclose or withhold information or to mislead and deceive) as well as their credulity (their tendency to trust or distrust information provided by the other agent). We study zero-shot LLM agents with simple prompting scaffolding as well as fine-tuned agents, in order to investigate whether optimising the agents to maximise financial profits makes them stronger negotiators but also more dishonest and less trusting. We find that off-the-shelf LLMs all substantially deviate from game-theoretical equilibria, they attempt to lie about their private information but cannot efficiently exploit information asymmetries. Fine-tuning on financial utility makes the agents stronger at achieving better deals but also more dishonest, highlighting the risks that optimising agents for a task can have on their safety. We release our code and a dataset of bargaining scenarios.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_31445
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Used Car Salesbots? Honesty and Credulity of LLMs as Bargaining Agents under Partial Information
Miceli-Barone, Antonio Valerio
Belle, Vaishak
Cohen, Shay B.
Computer Science and Game Theory
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
In this work we study agents in simulated bargaining scenarios, where a buyer and a seller communicate through a text channel and attempt to negotiate mutually beneficial trades, under different information regimes (complete information, information asymmetry or mutual uncertainty). We evaluate their performance w.r.t. game-theoretical solutions and further investigate their honesty (their tendency to disclose or withhold information or to mislead and deceive) as well as their credulity (their tendency to trust or distrust information provided by the other agent). We study zero-shot LLM agents with simple prompting scaffolding as well as fine-tuned agents, in order to investigate whether optimising the agents to maximise financial profits makes them stronger negotiators but also more dishonest and less trusting. We find that off-the-shelf LLMs all substantially deviate from game-theoretical equilibria, they attempt to lie about their private information but cannot efficiently exploit information asymmetries. Fine-tuning on financial utility makes the agents stronger at achieving better deals but also more dishonest, highlighting the risks that optimising agents for a task can have on their safety. We release our code and a dataset of bargaining scenarios.
title Used Car Salesbots? Honesty and Credulity of LLMs as Bargaining Agents under Partial Information
topic Computer Science and Game Theory
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31445