Electron vs. hole doping in infinite-layer nickelates: electronic structure, magnetism and correlations

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Day-Roberts, Ezra, Bernardini, Fabio, LaBollita, Harrison, Zhao, Yi-Feng, Cano, Andres, Botana, Antia S.
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866916068462690304
author Day-Roberts, Ezra
Bernardini, Fabio
LaBollita, Harrison
Zhao, Yi-Feng
Cano, Andres
Botana, Antia S.
author_facet Day-Roberts, Ezra
Bernardini, Fabio
LaBollita, Harrison
Zhao, Yi-Feng
Cano, Andres
Botana, Antia S.
contents The observation of superconductivity in undoped infinite-layer nickelates $R$NiO$_2$ ($R$ = rare earth) challenges our current understanding and calls for a re-examination of the underlying electronic structure of this family of materials. In this context, it is particularly important to extend the investigation of $R$NiO$_2$ compounds from the intensively studied hole-doped regime to the almost unexplored electron-doped one. Here, we use a combination of density-functional theory and dynamical mean-field theory to study the evolution of the electronic structure of infinite-layer nickelates in these two doping regimes. We find a striking asymmetry in the self-doping of the Ni-$d_{x^2-y^2}$ band due to the $R(5d)$ states: while this effect is strongly suppressed upon hole doping, electron doping instead leads to an increase in the size of the $R(5d)$ electron pockets, but without effectively hole-doping the Ni-$d_{x^2-y^2}$ band. This asymmetry has an important impact on the magnetic response as antiferromagnetism is rapidly suppressed upon hole doping, whereas it remains the ground state upon electron doping. Despite these differences, electronic correlations on both sides of the phase diagram are dominated by the Ni $d_{x^2-y^2}$ orbital, suggesting that a single-band description may be appropriate for infinite-layer nickelates in both the electron- and hole-doped regimes.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2606_00223
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Electron vs. hole doping in infinite-layer nickelates: electronic structure, magnetism and correlations
Day-Roberts, Ezra
Bernardini, Fabio
LaBollita, Harrison
Zhao, Yi-Feng
Cano, Andres
Botana, Antia S.
Strongly Correlated Electrons
Materials Science
Superconductivity
The observation of superconductivity in undoped infinite-layer nickelates $R$NiO$_2$ ($R$ = rare earth) challenges our current understanding and calls for a re-examination of the underlying electronic structure of this family of materials. In this context, it is particularly important to extend the investigation of $R$NiO$_2$ compounds from the intensively studied hole-doped regime to the almost unexplored electron-doped one. Here, we use a combination of density-functional theory and dynamical mean-field theory to study the evolution of the electronic structure of infinite-layer nickelates in these two doping regimes. We find a striking asymmetry in the self-doping of the Ni-$d_{x^2-y^2}$ band due to the $R(5d)$ states: while this effect is strongly suppressed upon hole doping, electron doping instead leads to an increase in the size of the $R(5d)$ electron pockets, but without effectively hole-doping the Ni-$d_{x^2-y^2}$ band. This asymmetry has an important impact on the magnetic response as antiferromagnetism is rapidly suppressed upon hole doping, whereas it remains the ground state upon electron doping. Despite these differences, electronic correlations on both sides of the phase diagram are dominated by the Ni $d_{x^2-y^2}$ orbital, suggesting that a single-band description may be appropriate for infinite-layer nickelates in both the electron- and hole-doped regimes.
title Electron vs. hole doping in infinite-layer nickelates: electronic structure, magnetism and correlations
topic Strongly Correlated Electrons
Materials Science
Superconductivity
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00223