Isolating LLM Lexical Bias: A Curation-Free Triangulated Metric for Preference-Stage Learning

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ming, Xiaoyang, Hernandez, Jose, Juzek, Thomas Stephan
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916068705959936
author Ming, Xiaoyang
Hernandez, Jose
Juzek, Thomas Stephan
author_facet Ming, Xiaoyang
Hernandez, Jose
Juzek, Thomas Stephan
contents Various language domains have undergone remarkable changes in recent years; these shifts are largely attributed to the advent of Large Language Models and their misalignment with natural language usage. These misalignments are thought to partly originate in the preference-learning stage, e.g. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback, which generally makes models more useful but simultaneously may introduce systematic lexical bias. In terms of lexical behavior, this is visible in a model's preference for certain formats or the overuse of words (delve, furthermore), even when such patterns are not present in base model outputs. Research on lexical misalignment induced during preference training is constrained by reliance on manual curation. We address this, by introducing the Triangulated Preference Shift score, a metric that triangulates between human gold standards, base models, and instruct variants to isolate shifts induced specifically by preference learning, without manual curation. We provide data across six model families, anchor the results in the literature, and illustrate the general approach's utility by analyzing whether preference learning shifts models toward what could be interpreted as a "language of prestige". The metric provides an initial automated method to quantify behavioral shifts attributable to preference tuning, and thus, may help inform model alignment and development of trustworthy AI.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2606_00334
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Isolating LLM Lexical Bias: A Curation-Free Triangulated Metric for Preference-Stage Learning
Ming, Xiaoyang
Hernandez, Jose
Juzek, Thomas Stephan
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
68T50
I.2.7
Various language domains have undergone remarkable changes in recent years; these shifts are largely attributed to the advent of Large Language Models and their misalignment with natural language usage. These misalignments are thought to partly originate in the preference-learning stage, e.g. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback, which generally makes models more useful but simultaneously may introduce systematic lexical bias. In terms of lexical behavior, this is visible in a model's preference for certain formats or the overuse of words (delve, furthermore), even when such patterns are not present in base model outputs. Research on lexical misalignment induced during preference training is constrained by reliance on manual curation. We address this, by introducing the Triangulated Preference Shift score, a metric that triangulates between human gold standards, base models, and instruct variants to isolate shifts induced specifically by preference learning, without manual curation. We provide data across six model families, anchor the results in the literature, and illustrate the general approach's utility by analyzing whether preference learning shifts models toward what could be interpreted as a "language of prestige". The metric provides an initial automated method to quantify behavioral shifts attributable to preference tuning, and thus, may help inform model alignment and development of trustworthy AI.
title Isolating LLM Lexical Bias: A Curation-Free Triangulated Metric for Preference-Stage Learning
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
68T50
I.2.7
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00334