Beyond Visual Memory: Mechanistic Diagnostics of Latent Visual Reasoning
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866910278705217536 |
|---|---|
| author | Guo, Garvin Chen, Yu Wang, Xiang Li, Shuai Zhao, Xinpei Liu, Huaxing Dong, Shuai |
| author_facet | Guo, Garvin Chen, Yu Wang, Xiang Li, Shuai Zhao, Xinpei Liu, Huaxing Dong, Shuai |
| contents | Recent latent visual reasoning methods achieve substantial gains by inserting continuous latent tokens into multimodal language models. These gains are commonly attributed to the tokens encoding visual evidence; recent analyses, however, reveal a paradox: the tokens are loosely tied to the image and contribute little to the answer. Critically, these analyses treat latent tokens as a single unit, obscuring the true source of the gains. We therefore decompose latent tokens into three testable components: latent slots, boundary markers, and format, and develop a state-of-the-art method as a probe under favorable conditions. Across six method-stage settings and four perception-heavy benchmarks, latent slots fail every prediction of the visual-memory account. Strikingly, retaining only the boundary markers preserves 78 to 100% of the gain in several settings, while the model attends to the image more narrowly at latent positions than at answer positions. The gain therefore comes from boundary markers, format, and this attention pattern, not from latent slots. How each method engages this mechanism depends on its training supervision: at matched accuracy, mechanisms can still differ markedly. Latent visual reasoning thus needs evaluation not only by accuracy but by what the model actually relies on. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2606_01287 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Beyond Visual Memory: Mechanistic Diagnostics of Latent Visual Reasoning Guo, Garvin Chen, Yu Wang, Xiang Li, Shuai Zhao, Xinpei Liu, Huaxing Dong, Shuai Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Artificial Intelligence Recent latent visual reasoning methods achieve substantial gains by inserting continuous latent tokens into multimodal language models. These gains are commonly attributed to the tokens encoding visual evidence; recent analyses, however, reveal a paradox: the tokens are loosely tied to the image and contribute little to the answer. Critically, these analyses treat latent tokens as a single unit, obscuring the true source of the gains. We therefore decompose latent tokens into three testable components: latent slots, boundary markers, and format, and develop a state-of-the-art method as a probe under favorable conditions. Across six method-stage settings and four perception-heavy benchmarks, latent slots fail every prediction of the visual-memory account. Strikingly, retaining only the boundary markers preserves 78 to 100% of the gain in several settings, while the model attends to the image more narrowly at latent positions than at answer positions. The gain therefore comes from boundary markers, format, and this attention pattern, not from latent slots. How each method engages this mechanism depends on its training supervision: at matched accuracy, mechanisms can still differ markedly. Latent visual reasoning thus needs evaluation not only by accuracy but by what the model actually relies on. |
| title | Beyond Visual Memory: Mechanistic Diagnostics of Latent Visual Reasoning |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01287 |