Emergent Transfer of a Physics Foundation Model from Simulation to Laboratory Turbulence
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866917553001988096 |
|---|---|
| author | Mukhopadhyay, Payel Nixon, Stefan S. Watteaux, Romain McCabe, Michael Bietti, Alberto Cho, Kyunghyun Diaconu, Cristiana Morales, Irina Espejo Fouhey, David Golkar, Siavash Hehir, Tom Ho, Shirley Kovalic, Jake Krawezik, Geraud Lanusse, Francois Marwah, Tanya Morel, Rudy Pettee, Mariel Qu, Helen Shen, Jeff Sotoudeh, Hadi Dalziel, Stuart B. Cranmer, Miles |
| author_facet | Mukhopadhyay, Payel Nixon, Stefan S. Watteaux, Romain McCabe, Michael Bietti, Alberto Cho, Kyunghyun Diaconu, Cristiana Morales, Irina Espejo Fouhey, David Golkar, Siavash Hehir, Tom Ho, Shirley Kovalic, Jake Krawezik, Geraud Lanusse, Francois Marwah, Tanya Morel, Rudy Pettee, Mariel Qu, Helen Shen, Jeff Sotoudeh, Hadi Dalziel, Stuart B. Cranmer, Miles |
| contents | Whether physics foundation models can be usefully deployed on laboratory experiments remains an open question for scientific machine learning (ML). We test this question on the Rayleigh-Taylor instability (RTI), a ubiquitous and demanding fluid instability seen from tabletop flows to supernova explosions, in which small perturbations at a density interface grow into chaotic, multiscale mixing as a lighter fluid accelerates into a heavier one. Standard ML models struggle with RTI, and despite over a century of theoretical, numerical, and experimental work, it carries an unresolved discrepancy between simulation and experiment: the late-time mixing growth rate, $α$, measured in most laboratory experiments ($\sim$ 0.06-0.07), is roughly three times the value from idealized direct numerical simulations (DNS, $\sim$ 0.02). The gap's origin remains debated. These properties make RTI a stringent test for a question that matters well beyond RTI: can foundation models trained only on simulations generalise to sparse, messy, and noisy laboratory settings? We finetune Walrus, a foundation model for continuum dynamics, on three or fewer DNS realizations and recover key RTI physics over long rollouts. Applied zero-shot to sliding-barrier laboratory data, the finetuned model leaves the DNS-like regime and enters the observed growth band, having never seen a single experimental sample. These results provide independent, data-driven evidence that initial conditions play a crucial role in the longstanding sim-experiment gap in $α$. The model also generalises zero-shot to stable stratification, a buoyancy regime absent from training, correctly slowing mixing-layer growth. Together, our results show that foundation models can generalise well beyond their training data, predicting laboratory behavior and unseen physical regimes, opening new ways to probe longstanding simulation-experiment gaps. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2606_01470 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Emergent Transfer of a Physics Foundation Model from Simulation to Laboratory Turbulence Mukhopadhyay, Payel Nixon, Stefan S. Watteaux, Romain McCabe, Michael Bietti, Alberto Cho, Kyunghyun Diaconu, Cristiana Morales, Irina Espejo Fouhey, David Golkar, Siavash Hehir, Tom Ho, Shirley Kovalic, Jake Krawezik, Geraud Lanusse, Francois Marwah, Tanya Morel, Rudy Pettee, Mariel Qu, Helen Shen, Jeff Sotoudeh, Hadi Dalziel, Stuart B. Cranmer, Miles Fluid Dynamics Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Whether physics foundation models can be usefully deployed on laboratory experiments remains an open question for scientific machine learning (ML). We test this question on the Rayleigh-Taylor instability (RTI), a ubiquitous and demanding fluid instability seen from tabletop flows to supernova explosions, in which small perturbations at a density interface grow into chaotic, multiscale mixing as a lighter fluid accelerates into a heavier one. Standard ML models struggle with RTI, and despite over a century of theoretical, numerical, and experimental work, it carries an unresolved discrepancy between simulation and experiment: the late-time mixing growth rate, $α$, measured in most laboratory experiments ($\sim$ 0.06-0.07), is roughly three times the value from idealized direct numerical simulations (DNS, $\sim$ 0.02). The gap's origin remains debated. These properties make RTI a stringent test for a question that matters well beyond RTI: can foundation models trained only on simulations generalise to sparse, messy, and noisy laboratory settings? We finetune Walrus, a foundation model for continuum dynamics, on three or fewer DNS realizations and recover key RTI physics over long rollouts. Applied zero-shot to sliding-barrier laboratory data, the finetuned model leaves the DNS-like regime and enters the observed growth band, having never seen a single experimental sample. These results provide independent, data-driven evidence that initial conditions play a crucial role in the longstanding sim-experiment gap in $α$. The model also generalises zero-shot to stable stratification, a buoyancy regime absent from training, correctly slowing mixing-layer growth. Together, our results show that foundation models can generalise well beyond their training data, predicting laboratory behavior and unseen physical regimes, opening new ways to probe longstanding simulation-experiment gaps. |
| title | Emergent Transfer of a Physics Foundation Model from Simulation to Laboratory Turbulence |
| topic | Fluid Dynamics Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01470 |