Learning Chaotic Dynamics through Second-Order Geometric Supervision
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914621743431680 |
|---|---|
| author | Kang, Shinhoo Nguyen, Hai V. Bui-Thanh, Tan |
| author_facet | Kang, Shinhoo Nguyen, Hai V. Bui-Thanh, Tan |
| contents | Learning chaotic dynamical systems from data requires more than short-term predictive accuracy: the learned model must preserve the attractor geometry and its invariant statistics. Trajectory (zero-order) and Jacobian (first-order) matching supervise the values and tangent structure of the vector field, but neither constrains how the field bends away from its tangent plane. A model can thus match values and tangents at the supervised states yet curve differently from the truth, remaining locally accurate while drifting toward spurious attractors and distorting long-time statistics. We show that enforcing second-order consistency mitigates these failures, but forming the full Hessian is prohibitive in high dimensions. We propose model-constrained randomized Jacobian matching, which compares the Jacobians of the true and learned vector fields at randomly perturbed inputs. A Taylor expansion shows that the expected randomized Jacobian loss decomposes into the nominal Jacobian mismatch plus a Hessian mismatch scaled by the noise variance, implicitly enforcing second-order consistency at $\mathcal{O}(d^2)$ cost without forming the $\mathcal{O}(d^3)$ Hessian tensor. Using only Jacobian evaluations, the method scales to high dimensions where explicit Hessian matching does not. Numerical experiments confirm that second-order methods are robust. For Lorenz~63, first-order methods produce catastrophic Lyapunov-exponent outliers under minimal temporal supervision, which second-order methods eliminate while recovering the correct attractor. For coupled Lorenz~96, an out-of-distribution forcing sweep separates the methods: all agree up to $F=16$, but beyond $F=18$ only second-order methods preserve the invariant measure and Lyapunov spectrum. On both systems, randomized Jacobian matching performs comparably to explicit Hessian matching at much lower cost. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2606_01596 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Learning Chaotic Dynamics through Second-Order Geometric Supervision Kang, Shinhoo Nguyen, Hai V. Bui-Thanh, Tan Numerical Analysis Machine Learning 68T07, 37M25, 65P20 I.2.6; G.1.7; G.1.4 Learning chaotic dynamical systems from data requires more than short-term predictive accuracy: the learned model must preserve the attractor geometry and its invariant statistics. Trajectory (zero-order) and Jacobian (first-order) matching supervise the values and tangent structure of the vector field, but neither constrains how the field bends away from its tangent plane. A model can thus match values and tangents at the supervised states yet curve differently from the truth, remaining locally accurate while drifting toward spurious attractors and distorting long-time statistics. We show that enforcing second-order consistency mitigates these failures, but forming the full Hessian is prohibitive in high dimensions. We propose model-constrained randomized Jacobian matching, which compares the Jacobians of the true and learned vector fields at randomly perturbed inputs. A Taylor expansion shows that the expected randomized Jacobian loss decomposes into the nominal Jacobian mismatch plus a Hessian mismatch scaled by the noise variance, implicitly enforcing second-order consistency at $\mathcal{O}(d^2)$ cost without forming the $\mathcal{O}(d^3)$ Hessian tensor. Using only Jacobian evaluations, the method scales to high dimensions where explicit Hessian matching does not. Numerical experiments confirm that second-order methods are robust. For Lorenz~63, first-order methods produce catastrophic Lyapunov-exponent outliers under minimal temporal supervision, which second-order methods eliminate while recovering the correct attractor. For coupled Lorenz~96, an out-of-distribution forcing sweep separates the methods: all agree up to $F=16$, but beyond $F=18$ only second-order methods preserve the invariant measure and Lyapunov spectrum. On both systems, randomized Jacobian matching performs comparably to explicit Hessian matching at much lower cost. |
| title | Learning Chaotic Dynamics through Second-Order Geometric Supervision |
| topic | Numerical Analysis Machine Learning 68T07, 37M25, 65P20 I.2.6; G.1.7; G.1.4 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01596 |