Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen, Bin, Liao, Xinye, Liu, Yiming, Liao, Xin, Liu, Chonghan
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01830
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917553634279424
author Chen, Bin
Liao, Xinye
Liu, Yiming
Liao, Xin
Liu, Chonghan
author_facet Chen, Bin
Liao, Xinye
Liu, Yiming
Liao, Xin
Liu, Chonghan
contents Recent LLM search agents use reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) to learn search-augmented reasoning from outcome rewards. On hard problems, these agents rarely sample end-to-end successful rollouts, leaving outcome-only RLVR with few positive-reward trajectories. We argue that improving learning on such problems requires additional guidance during training, and RLVR already contains verifier-side information that can provide it. This information can identify errors or omissions in the agent's submitted answer and guide revision within the rollout. We propose a training-time mechanism called \textbf{Credit-Attenuated Privileged Feedback} (CAPF), which makes this verifier-side information available through a Privileged Feedback call during training. CAPF lets the policy revise zero-reward attempts into positive-reward repair trajectories and attenuates credit for the feedback call and earlier actions to accommodate deployment without this call. Empirical research demonstrates that CAPF improves Qwen3-4B's average exact-match score from 44.7% under outcome-only RLVR to 48.5% on seven open-domain QA benchmarks.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2606_01830
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle CAPF: Guiding Search-Agent Rollouts with Credit-Attenuated Privileged Feedback
Chen, Bin
Liao, Xinye
Liu, Yiming
Liao, Xin
Liu, Chonghan
Artificial Intelligence
Recent LLM search agents use reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) to learn search-augmented reasoning from outcome rewards. On hard problems, these agents rarely sample end-to-end successful rollouts, leaving outcome-only RLVR with few positive-reward trajectories. We argue that improving learning on such problems requires additional guidance during training, and RLVR already contains verifier-side information that can provide it. This information can identify errors or omissions in the agent's submitted answer and guide revision within the rollout. We propose a training-time mechanism called \textbf{Credit-Attenuated Privileged Feedback} (CAPF), which makes this verifier-side information available through a Privileged Feedback call during training. CAPF lets the policy revise zero-reward attempts into positive-reward repair trajectories and attenuates credit for the feedback call and earlier actions to accommodate deployment without this call. Empirical research demonstrates that CAPF improves Qwen3-4B's average exact-match score from 44.7% under outcome-only RLVR to 48.5% on seven open-domain QA benchmarks.
title CAPF: Guiding Search-Agent Rollouts with Credit-Attenuated Privileged Feedback
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01830