Multimodal Approaches for Visually-Rich Document Type Classification: A Comparative Analysis
Fuente:
arXiv
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2026
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866916074495148032 |
|---|---|
| author | Heyne, Catyana Frikel, Jürgen Riccio, Filippo |
| author_facet | Heyne, Catyana Frikel, Jürgen Riccio, Filippo |
| contents | Document type classification in visually rich documents remains challenging, as relevant information is distributed across textual, visual, and layout modalities. To capture this complexity, current approaches rely on diverse multimodal modeling strategies, resulting in heterogeneous architectures that complicate systematic comparison. This variability is also reflected in existing comparative studies, which often rely on heterogeneous evaluation setups, further complicating systematic comparison and making it difficult to assess progress. To address these limitations, this work provides a structured analysis of multimodal design strategies across transformer- and LLM-based architectures, combined with a controlled empirical comparison within a unified experimental framework. Specifically, four representative models (LayoutLMv3, Donut, Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct, and Qwen3-32B) are evaluated on the RVL-CDIP benchmark to systematically analyze the contributions of text, image, and layout information for document type classification, with a particular focus on contrasting OCR-dependent and OCR-free approaches. The results show that specialized multimodal Transformers outperform LLM-based approaches on visually rich and layout-intensive documents. Image information contributes most strongly to reliable classification, while OCR-derived text provides useful but secondary support. These findings highlight that multimodal processing remains essential for documents with pronounced layout structure. Overall, the study provides a systematic basis for comparing multimodal architectures and offers practical guidance for selecting effective feature combinations and model designs for document type classification. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2606_02162 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Multimodal Approaches for Visually-Rich Document Type Classification: A Comparative Analysis Heyne, Catyana Frikel, Jürgen Riccio, Filippo Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language Information Retrieval I.7.0; I.7.5; I.2.1; I.4.9; I.5.2; I.5.4 Document type classification in visually rich documents remains challenging, as relevant information is distributed across textual, visual, and layout modalities. To capture this complexity, current approaches rely on diverse multimodal modeling strategies, resulting in heterogeneous architectures that complicate systematic comparison. This variability is also reflected in existing comparative studies, which often rely on heterogeneous evaluation setups, further complicating systematic comparison and making it difficult to assess progress. To address these limitations, this work provides a structured analysis of multimodal design strategies across transformer- and LLM-based architectures, combined with a controlled empirical comparison within a unified experimental framework. Specifically, four representative models (LayoutLMv3, Donut, Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct, and Qwen3-32B) are evaluated on the RVL-CDIP benchmark to systematically analyze the contributions of text, image, and layout information for document type classification, with a particular focus on contrasting OCR-dependent and OCR-free approaches. The results show that specialized multimodal Transformers outperform LLM-based approaches on visually rich and layout-intensive documents. Image information contributes most strongly to reliable classification, while OCR-derived text provides useful but secondary support. These findings highlight that multimodal processing remains essential for documents with pronounced layout structure. Overall, the study provides a systematic basis for comparing multimodal architectures and offers practical guidance for selecting effective feature combinations and model designs for document type classification. |
| title | Multimodal Approaches for Visually-Rich Document Type Classification: A Comparative Analysis |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language Information Retrieval I.7.0; I.7.5; I.2.1; I.4.9; I.5.2; I.5.4 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02162 |