Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2002
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0212178 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- As argued in our previous papers, it would be more natural to modify the standard approach to quantum theory by requiring that i) one unitary irreducible representation (UIR) of the symmetry algebra should describe a particle and its antiparticle simultaneously. This would automatically explain the existence of antiparticles and show that a particle and its antiparticle are different states of the same object. If i) is adopted then among the Poincare, so(2,3) and so(1,4) algebras only the latter is a candidate for constructing elementary particle theory. We extend our analysis in hep-th/0210144 and prove that: 1) UIRs of the so(1,4) algebra can indeed be interpreted in the framework of i) and cannot be interpreted in the framework of the standard approach; 2) as a consequence of a new symmetry (called AB one) between particles and antiparticles for UIRs satisfying i), elementary particles described by UIRs of the so(1,4) algebra can be only fermions; 3) as a consequence of the AB symmetry, the vacuum condition can be consistent only for particles with the half-integer spin (in conventional units) and therefore only such particles can be elementary. In our approach the well known fact that fermions have imaginary parity is a consequence of the AB symmetry.