Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
1972
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED071707 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867181156558962688 |
|---|---|
| author | Woods, R. G. |
| author_facet | Woods, R. G. Woods, R. G. |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | The Cost of Cataloguing: Three Systems Compared. Woods, R. G. Cataloging College Libraries Comparative Analysis Cost Effectiveness Library Automation Library Technical Processes Too little is known generally about the cost of the various operations carried out in libraries. At present, new techniques are being devised using computers to store, sort, file and reproduce data formerly dealt with by traditional manual methods. Computer time, however, is expensive, and the computer programs to handle bibliographic data are difficult and costly to write and test. There is a danger that the new techniques may simply be too expensive. This study reports on three cataloging systems, and the costs incurred by each, employed at the University of Southampton Library: manual, mechanized (using a tape typewriter), and automated (using MARC data). (Author/SJ) |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_ED071707 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 1972 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | The Cost of Cataloguing: Three Systems Compared. Woods, R. G. Cataloging College Libraries Comparative Analysis Cost Effectiveness Library Automation Library Technical Processes The Cost of Cataloguing: Three Systems Compared. Woods, R. G. Cataloging College Libraries Comparative Analysis Cost Effectiveness Library Automation Library Technical Processes Too little is known generally about the cost of the various operations carried out in libraries. At present, new techniques are being devised using computers to store, sort, file and reproduce data formerly dealt with by traditional manual methods. Computer time, however, is expensive, and the computer programs to handle bibliographic data are difficult and costly to write and test. There is a danger that the new techniques may simply be too expensive. This study reports on three cataloging systems, and the costs incurred by each, employed at the University of Southampton Library: manual, mechanized (using a tape typewriter), and automated (using MARC data). (Author/SJ) |
| title | The Cost of Cataloguing: Three Systems Compared. |
| topic | Cataloging College Libraries Comparative Analysis Cost Effectiveness Library Automation Library Technical Processes |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED071707 |