Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Fortune, Jim C., Hutchinson, Thomas E.
Format: Recurso educativo Open Access
Sprache:en
Veröffentlicht: 1972
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED097383
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867181602907357184
author Fortune, Jim C.
Hutchinson, Thomas E.
author_facet Fortune, Jim C.
Hutchinson, Thomas E.
Fortune, Jim C.
Hutchinson, Thomas E.
collection Education Resources Information Center
contents The Contrast Between Title I and Non-Title I Schools. Fortune, Jim C. Hutchinson, Thomas E. Academic Achievement Classroom Environment Comparative Analysis Compensatory Education Educational Environment Enrollment Instructional Materials Library Facilities Lunch Programs National Surveys Socioeconomic Status Student Characteristics Urban Schools The problem addressed in this paper is to compare the schools identified as participating in Title I, 1965 Elementary Secondary Education Act programs, with those identified as not participating in Title I, with regard to percentage of pupils on welfare, number of target group pupils, percentage of pupils reading below grade level, percentage of pupils receiving free lunches, type and quality of a library and special classroom facilities, conditions of physical plant, and ratings of instructional materials. Since degrees of urbanism had previously been shown to be related to some of the variables in question, the schools were grouped across the urban location variable for each comparison. Data was derived from the 1970 Survey of Compensatory Education, which included over 58,000 schools from 800 districts chosen at random from the states participating in the Belmont system. Of those schools over 33,000 have been identified as having Title I programs and nearly 25,000 have been identified as non-Title I schools. The survey had been so administrated that these schools were weighted to project the national population of elementary schools in districts having enrollments greater than 300 pupils. The comparisons between the Title I schools and the non-Title I schools utilized crosstabulations built on each of the subgroups. (Author/JM)
format Recurso educativo Open Access
id eric_ED097383
institution ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
language en
publishDate 1972
record_format eric
spellingShingle The Contrast Between Title I and Non-Title I Schools.
Fortune, Jim C.
Hutchinson, Thomas E.
Academic Achievement
Classroom Environment
Comparative Analysis
Compensatory Education
Educational Environment
Enrollment
Instructional Materials
Library Facilities
Lunch Programs
National Surveys
Socioeconomic Status
Student Characteristics
Urban Schools
The Contrast Between Title I and Non-Title I Schools. Fortune, Jim C. Hutchinson, Thomas E. Academic Achievement Classroom Environment Comparative Analysis Compensatory Education Educational Environment Enrollment Instructional Materials Library Facilities Lunch Programs National Surveys Socioeconomic Status Student Characteristics Urban Schools The problem addressed in this paper is to compare the schools identified as participating in Title I, 1965 Elementary Secondary Education Act programs, with those identified as not participating in Title I, with regard to percentage of pupils on welfare, number of target group pupils, percentage of pupils reading below grade level, percentage of pupils receiving free lunches, type and quality of a library and special classroom facilities, conditions of physical plant, and ratings of instructional materials. Since degrees of urbanism had previously been shown to be related to some of the variables in question, the schools were grouped across the urban location variable for each comparison. Data was derived from the 1970 Survey of Compensatory Education, which included over 58,000 schools from 800 districts chosen at random from the states participating in the Belmont system. Of those schools over 33,000 have been identified as having Title I programs and nearly 25,000 have been identified as non-Title I schools. The survey had been so administrated that these schools were weighted to project the national population of elementary schools in districts having enrollments greater than 300 pupils. The comparisons between the Title I schools and the non-Title I schools utilized crosstabulations built on each of the subgroups. (Author/JM)
title The Contrast Between Title I and Non-Title I Schools.
topic Academic Achievement
Classroom Environment
Comparative Analysis
Compensatory Education
Educational Environment
Enrollment
Instructional Materials
Library Facilities
Lunch Programs
National Surveys
Socioeconomic Status
Student Characteristics
Urban Schools
url https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED097383