Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jarvis, Mel
Format: Recurso educativo Open Access
Language:en
Published: 1982
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED226438
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867181821847928832
author Jarvis, Mel
author_facet Jarvis, Mel
Jarvis, Mel
collection Education Resources Information Center
contents U.S. Supreme Court Attempts to Establish New First Amendment "Right": Pico v. Island Trees School Board. Jarvis, Mel Board of Education Role Censorship Court Litigation Elementary Secondary Education Federal Courts Freedom of Speech Moral Values School Districts In the case of "Pico v. Island Trees Union Free School District," involving school library censorship by a Long Island (New York) board, the U.S. Supreme Court in 1982 failed to decide whether board discretion or First Amendment rights should prevail, and instead remanded the case to lower courts. The author of this document first reviews the events leading up to the parents' suit against the board for removing books from the school libraries; he describes the decisions for the board in federal district court and for the parents in circuit court. Next he reviews the issues as seen in the Court's plurality opinion, by Justice Brennan, which emphasized First Amendment rights and the need to know the board's intent. He then explains dissenting opinions by Justices Burger, Powell, Rehnquist, and O'Connor, which saw the Court's action as an infringement on school boards' rights. Subsequently the author compares the two positions. He lists three conclusions about the case: first, that public education is the responsibility of states and school boards; second, that First Amendment cases engender confusing side issues; and, third, that boards should publish clear policies and apply them consistently. (RW)
format Recurso educativo Open Access
id eric_ED226438
institution ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
language en
publishDate 1982
record_format eric
spellingShingle U.S. Supreme Court Attempts to Establish New First Amendment "Right": Pico v. Island Trees School Board.
Jarvis, Mel
Board of Education Role
Censorship
Court Litigation
Elementary Secondary Education
Federal Courts
Freedom of Speech
Moral Values
School Districts
U.S. Supreme Court Attempts to Establish New First Amendment "Right": Pico v. Island Trees School Board. Jarvis, Mel Board of Education Role Censorship Court Litigation Elementary Secondary Education Federal Courts Freedom of Speech Moral Values School Districts In the case of "Pico v. Island Trees Union Free School District," involving school library censorship by a Long Island (New York) board, the U.S. Supreme Court in 1982 failed to decide whether board discretion or First Amendment rights should prevail, and instead remanded the case to lower courts. The author of this document first reviews the events leading up to the parents' suit against the board for removing books from the school libraries; he describes the decisions for the board in federal district court and for the parents in circuit court. Next he reviews the issues as seen in the Court's plurality opinion, by Justice Brennan, which emphasized First Amendment rights and the need to know the board's intent. He then explains dissenting opinions by Justices Burger, Powell, Rehnquist, and O'Connor, which saw the Court's action as an infringement on school boards' rights. Subsequently the author compares the two positions. He lists three conclusions about the case: first, that public education is the responsibility of states and school boards; second, that First Amendment cases engender confusing side issues; and, third, that boards should publish clear policies and apply them consistently. (RW)
title U.S. Supreme Court Attempts to Establish New First Amendment "Right": Pico v. Island Trees School Board.
topic Board of Education Role
Censorship
Court Litigation
Elementary Secondary Education
Federal Courts
Freedom of Speech
Moral Values
School Districts
url https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED226438