Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Langue: | en |
| Publié: |
1987
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED284583 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1867181789638819840 |
|---|---|
| author | Christopher, Rachel Culpepper, Jetta |
| author_facet | Christopher, Rachel Culpepper, Jetta Christopher, Rachel Culpepper, Jetta |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | Library Faculty Evaluation: Criteria and Scoring Instrument. Christopher, Rachel Culpepper, Jetta Academic Libraries Academic Rank (Professional) Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Methods Higher Education Job Performance Librarians Personnel Evaluation Promotion (Occupational) Records (Forms) Research Teaching Skills Tenure In an effort to improve individual progress toward meeting university requirements for promotion and tenure, librarians at Murray State University (Kentucky) recently revised their Faculty Activities Report and Faculty Evaluation forms to meet the following objectives: (1) to develop a Faculty Activities Report form that would be easier to administer and more equitable, providing for a continuous listing of activities through the years rather than the annual listing formerly used; and (2) to develop a Faculty Evaluation form that would specifically address university criteria for promotion and tenure. The new Faculty Activities Report form allows faculty members to keep account of their accomplishments during each calendar year in the five categories of teaching excellence/job performance, research/creative achievement, professional service, academic and professional service, and university service. Designed to be used for the evaluation of each librarian by his or her immediate supervisor, the new Faculty Evaluation form includes a rating scale of 1 to 5 for the criteria of teaching excellence/job performance (70% of the total score), research/creativity (20%), and service (10%). The Faculty Evaluation form and rating scale are included. (KM) |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_ED284583 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 1987 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | Library Faculty Evaluation: Criteria and Scoring Instrument. Christopher, Rachel Culpepper, Jetta Academic Libraries Academic Rank (Professional) Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Methods Higher Education Job Performance Librarians Personnel Evaluation Promotion (Occupational) Records (Forms) Research Teaching Skills Tenure Library Faculty Evaluation: Criteria and Scoring Instrument. Christopher, Rachel Culpepper, Jetta Academic Libraries Academic Rank (Professional) Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Methods Higher Education Job Performance Librarians Personnel Evaluation Promotion (Occupational) Records (Forms) Research Teaching Skills Tenure In an effort to improve individual progress toward meeting university requirements for promotion and tenure, librarians at Murray State University (Kentucky) recently revised their Faculty Activities Report and Faculty Evaluation forms to meet the following objectives: (1) to develop a Faculty Activities Report form that would be easier to administer and more equitable, providing for a continuous listing of activities through the years rather than the annual listing formerly used; and (2) to develop a Faculty Evaluation form that would specifically address university criteria for promotion and tenure. The new Faculty Activities Report form allows faculty members to keep account of their accomplishments during each calendar year in the five categories of teaching excellence/job performance, research/creative achievement, professional service, academic and professional service, and university service. Designed to be used for the evaluation of each librarian by his or her immediate supervisor, the new Faculty Evaluation form includes a rating scale of 1 to 5 for the criteria of teaching excellence/job performance (70% of the total score), research/creativity (20%), and service (10%). The Faculty Evaluation form and rating scale are included. (KM) |
| title | Library Faculty Evaluation: Criteria and Scoring Instrument. |
| topic | Academic Libraries Academic Rank (Professional) Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Methods Higher Education Job Performance Librarians Personnel Evaluation Promotion (Occupational) Records (Forms) Research Teaching Skills Tenure |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED284583 |