Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Baker, Sharon L.
Format: Recurso educativo Open Access
Sprache:en
Veröffentlicht: 1987
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED288538
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867180923879948289
author Baker, Sharon L.
author_facet Baker, Sharon L.
Baker, Sharon L.
collection Education Resources Information Center
contents Exploring the Use of "Output Measures for Public Libraries" in North Carolina Public Libraries. Baker, Sharon L. Adoption (Ideas) Evaluation Criteria Library Administration Library Directors Library Planning Library Services Library Standards Library Surveys Long Range Planning Operations Research Public Libraries Research Methodology Use Studies This study was designed to determine: (1) whether the 5-year planning cycle described in the 1980 manual "A Planning Process for Public Libraries" is being used in North Carolina's public libraries; (2) whether output measures described in a second publication released in 1982 are being collected in the state's public libraries; (3) the levels of performance that are being achieved on the various output measures; and (4) whether variations in selected measures are associated with other underlying factors. The supposition that larger libraries should be adopting such innovations in planning and accountability as the methods described in "A Planning Process for Public Libraries" and "Output Measures for Public Libraries" at a faster rate than smaller libraries is also examined. Based on an analysis of the responses of 61 North Carolina libraries to a questionnaire distributed to the 106 library directors in the state, study results indicate that a quarter of the directors were using the recommended 5-year planning cycle, fewer than half of the directors were using at least some of the output measures, and no library collected data on all of the measures. It was tentatively concluded that North Carolina libraries appear to be following a national pattern of non-use of the two manuals, and it is recommended that steps be taken so that public libraries in North Carolina will recognize the importance of planning and evaluation. Study results are presented in nine tables, and nine footnotes are provided. (KM)
format Recurso educativo Open Access
id eric_ED288538
institution ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
language en
publishDate 1987
record_format eric
spellingShingle Exploring the Use of "Output Measures for Public Libraries" in North Carolina Public Libraries.
Baker, Sharon L.
Adoption (Ideas)
Evaluation Criteria
Library Administration
Library Directors
Library Planning
Library Services
Library Standards
Library Surveys
Long Range Planning
Operations Research
Public Libraries
Research Methodology
Use Studies
Exploring the Use of "Output Measures for Public Libraries" in North Carolina Public Libraries. Baker, Sharon L. Adoption (Ideas) Evaluation Criteria Library Administration Library Directors Library Planning Library Services Library Standards Library Surveys Long Range Planning Operations Research Public Libraries Research Methodology Use Studies This study was designed to determine: (1) whether the 5-year planning cycle described in the 1980 manual "A Planning Process for Public Libraries" is being used in North Carolina's public libraries; (2) whether output measures described in a second publication released in 1982 are being collected in the state's public libraries; (3) the levels of performance that are being achieved on the various output measures; and (4) whether variations in selected measures are associated with other underlying factors. The supposition that larger libraries should be adopting such innovations in planning and accountability as the methods described in "A Planning Process for Public Libraries" and "Output Measures for Public Libraries" at a faster rate than smaller libraries is also examined. Based on an analysis of the responses of 61 North Carolina libraries to a questionnaire distributed to the 106 library directors in the state, study results indicate that a quarter of the directors were using the recommended 5-year planning cycle, fewer than half of the directors were using at least some of the output measures, and no library collected data on all of the measures. It was tentatively concluded that North Carolina libraries appear to be following a national pattern of non-use of the two manuals, and it is recommended that steps be taken so that public libraries in North Carolina will recognize the importance of planning and evaluation. Study results are presented in nine tables, and nine footnotes are provided. (KM)
title Exploring the Use of "Output Measures for Public Libraries" in North Carolina Public Libraries.
topic Adoption (Ideas)
Evaluation Criteria
Library Administration
Library Directors
Library Planning
Library Services
Library Standards
Library Surveys
Long Range Planning
Operations Research
Public Libraries
Research Methodology
Use Studies
url https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED288538