Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Telerski, R. Michele
Format: Recurso educativo Open Access
Language:en
Published: 1995
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED390399
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867181633905360896
author Telerski, R. Michele
author_facet Telerski, R. Michele
Telerski, R. Michele
collection Education Resources Information Center
contents Bibliographic Control of Preservation Photocopies. Telerski, R. Michele Academic Libraries Bibliographic Records Case Studies Cataloging Internet Library Catalogs Library Surveys Online Catalogs Preservation Records Management Reprography This study examines how American Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries catalog full-volume, monographic, non-cartographic, preservation photocopies and explores the use of full, minimal, or dependent bibliographic records. It analyzes On-line Public Access Catalog (OPAC) records structure for multiple versions materials in terms of composite, hierarchical, or separate records. Through use of survey and on-line records analysis, the study also examines whether a relationship exists between the OPAC records structure at an institution and the accuracy of its holdings information on OCLC. An exploratory survey was sent to preservation officers at 66 American academic ARL member libraries (28 were returned) who made preservation photocopies during the fiscal year 1991-92; the officers were asked to provide basic bibliographic information about five titles of non-cartographic monographs for which entire volume preservation photocopies had been made within the past 2 years. Searches conducted on the Internet and OCLC and records for each institution were analyzed. Results indicated that the most common means of recording preservation photocopy information is the 533 field; institutions are also using the local note, 59X field and adding the same information found in 533 to provide the photocopy information. Among institutions recataloging their photocopied works using the 533 field, less than half are updating their holdings symbol on OCLC. The majority of institutions OPACs could be categorized as utilizing separate bibliographic records structure. All of the institutions using the holdings record for preservation information had a hierarchical structure. Composite records typically did not contain preservation information. Overall, the study indicates that there is still little consistency in the way preservation photocopies are being cataloged. Five tables provide information. (Contains 26 references.) (Author/AEF)
format Recurso educativo Open Access
id eric_ED390399
institution ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
language en
publishDate 1995
record_format eric
spellingShingle Bibliographic Control of Preservation Photocopies.
Telerski, R. Michele
Academic Libraries
Bibliographic Records
Case Studies
Cataloging
Internet
Library Catalogs
Library Surveys
Online Catalogs
Preservation
Records Management
Reprography
Bibliographic Control of Preservation Photocopies. Telerski, R. Michele Academic Libraries Bibliographic Records Case Studies Cataloging Internet Library Catalogs Library Surveys Online Catalogs Preservation Records Management Reprography This study examines how American Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries catalog full-volume, monographic, non-cartographic, preservation photocopies and explores the use of full, minimal, or dependent bibliographic records. It analyzes On-line Public Access Catalog (OPAC) records structure for multiple versions materials in terms of composite, hierarchical, or separate records. Through use of survey and on-line records analysis, the study also examines whether a relationship exists between the OPAC records structure at an institution and the accuracy of its holdings information on OCLC. An exploratory survey was sent to preservation officers at 66 American academic ARL member libraries (28 were returned) who made preservation photocopies during the fiscal year 1991-92; the officers were asked to provide basic bibliographic information about five titles of non-cartographic monographs for which entire volume preservation photocopies had been made within the past 2 years. Searches conducted on the Internet and OCLC and records for each institution were analyzed. Results indicated that the most common means of recording preservation photocopy information is the 533 field; institutions are also using the local note, 59X field and adding the same information found in 533 to provide the photocopy information. Among institutions recataloging their photocopied works using the 533 field, less than half are updating their holdings symbol on OCLC. The majority of institutions OPACs could be categorized as utilizing separate bibliographic records structure. All of the institutions using the holdings record for preservation information had a hierarchical structure. Composite records typically did not contain preservation information. Overall, the study indicates that there is still little consistency in the way preservation photocopies are being cataloged. Five tables provide information. (Contains 26 references.) (Author/AEF)
title Bibliographic Control of Preservation Photocopies.
topic Academic Libraries
Bibliographic Records
Case Studies
Cataloging
Internet
Library Catalogs
Library Surveys
Online Catalogs
Preservation
Records Management
Reprography
url https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED390399