Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hogan, Donna R., Comp., Dahlbach, Barbara J., Comp.
Format: Recurso educativo Open Access
Language:en
Published: 1997
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED409899
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867181049119768576
author Hogan, Donna R., Comp.
Dahlbach, Barbara J., Comp.
author_facet Hogan, Donna R., Comp.
Dahlbach, Barbara J., Comp.
Hogan, Donna R., Comp.
Dahlbach, Barbara J., Comp.
collection Education Resources Information Center
contents Electronic Resource Sharing. SPEC Kit 222. Hogan, Donna R., Comp. Dahlbach, Barbara J., Comp. Academic Libraries Change Computer Mediated Communication Consortia Cooperative Programs Costs Electronic Journals Electronic Libraries Higher Education Library Cooperation Library Funding Library Networks Library Services Library Statistics Library Surveys Online Systems Shared Resources and Services Technological Advancement The Systems and Procedures Exchange Center (SPEC) surveyed Association of Research Libraries (ARL) institutions to measure the degree of electronic resource sharing in ARL libraries; to discover which resources are being shared and between what kinds of institutions; and what documentation is available. Of the 119 ARL institutions surveyed, 53 responses were received, out of which 39 institutions completed the entire survey and reported sharing electronic resources. Data revealed that 46% of responding institutions implemented electronic resource sharing in the last 1-3 years. The most frequently shared electronic information resource is the tape-loaded index. The most frequently cited motivations to share were "enrichment of resources available to all participants" (97%) and"cost" (87%). Improved technology and the desire to test technical capabilities were also important motivations. Generally, costs of subscriptions and telecommunications are borne by individual institutions, while one institution maintains the database. Change in the area of electronic resources is occurring more rapidly than in any other area affecting libraries. Survey results are followed by a list of responding institutions, a description of selected electronic resource sharing groups, a consortial agreement from North Carolina State University, and an alphabetical listing of electronic research databases at Ohio University. (Contains 33 references.) (SWC)
format Recurso educativo Open Access
id eric_ED409899
institution ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
language en
publishDate 1997
record_format eric
spellingShingle Electronic Resource Sharing. SPEC Kit 222.
Hogan, Donna R., Comp.
Dahlbach, Barbara J., Comp.
Academic Libraries
Change
Computer Mediated Communication
Consortia
Cooperative Programs
Costs
Electronic Journals
Electronic Libraries
Higher Education
Library Cooperation
Library Funding
Library Networks
Library Services
Library Statistics
Library Surveys
Online Systems
Shared Resources and Services
Technological Advancement
Electronic Resource Sharing. SPEC Kit 222. Hogan, Donna R., Comp. Dahlbach, Barbara J., Comp. Academic Libraries Change Computer Mediated Communication Consortia Cooperative Programs Costs Electronic Journals Electronic Libraries Higher Education Library Cooperation Library Funding Library Networks Library Services Library Statistics Library Surveys Online Systems Shared Resources and Services Technological Advancement The Systems and Procedures Exchange Center (SPEC) surveyed Association of Research Libraries (ARL) institutions to measure the degree of electronic resource sharing in ARL libraries; to discover which resources are being shared and between what kinds of institutions; and what documentation is available. Of the 119 ARL institutions surveyed, 53 responses were received, out of which 39 institutions completed the entire survey and reported sharing electronic resources. Data revealed that 46% of responding institutions implemented electronic resource sharing in the last 1-3 years. The most frequently shared electronic information resource is the tape-loaded index. The most frequently cited motivations to share were "enrichment of resources available to all participants" (97%) and"cost" (87%). Improved technology and the desire to test technical capabilities were also important motivations. Generally, costs of subscriptions and telecommunications are borne by individual institutions, while one institution maintains the database. Change in the area of electronic resources is occurring more rapidly than in any other area affecting libraries. Survey results are followed by a list of responding institutions, a description of selected electronic resource sharing groups, a consortial agreement from North Carolina State University, and an alphabetical listing of electronic research databases at Ohio University. (Contains 33 references.) (SWC)
title Electronic Resource Sharing. SPEC Kit 222.
topic Academic Libraries
Change
Computer Mediated Communication
Consortia
Cooperative Programs
Costs
Electronic Journals
Electronic Libraries
Higher Education
Library Cooperation
Library Funding
Library Networks
Library Services
Library Statistics
Library Surveys
Online Systems
Shared Resources and Services
Technological Advancement
url https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED409899