Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
2006
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED503076 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867181639314964480 |
|---|---|
| author | Harley, Diane Henke, Johnathan Lawrence, Shannon Miller, Ian Perciali, Irene Nasatir, David |
| author_facet | Harley, Diane Henke, Johnathan Lawrence, Shannon Miller, Ian Perciali, Irene Nasatir, David Harley, Diane Henke, Johnathan Lawrence, Shannon Miller, Ian Perciali, Irene Nasatir, David |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | Use and Users of Digital Resources: A Focus on Undergraduate Education in the Humanities and Social Sciences Harley, Diane Henke, Johnathan Lawrence, Shannon Miller, Ian Perciali, Irene Nasatir, David Undergraduate Study Focus Groups Social Sciences Educational Technology Internet Humanities Undergraduate Students Teacher Surveys Access to Information Information Utilization College Faculty Literature Reviews Computer Software Data Analysis The purpose of our research was (1) to map the universe of digital resources available to a subset of undergraduate educators in the humanities and social sciences, and (2) to investigate how and if available digital resources are actually being used in undergraduate teaching environments. We employed multiple methods, including surveys and focus groups. Our definition of digital resources was intentionally broad and included rich media objects (e.g., maps, video, images, etc.) as well as text. Appended are: (1) Digital Resources--a Snapshot; (2) Site Owner Advisory Group; (3) CSHE [Center for Studies in Higher Education]/CDL [California Digital Library] Educational Technology & Librarian Meeting Participants; (4) Faculty Survey--Instrument; (5) Faculty Survey--Non-response Interview Protocol; (6) Faculty Survey--Non-response Results Tables; (7) Principal Component Analysis--Factor Matrices; (8) Faculty Survey--Results Tables; (9) Specific Digital Resources Listed by Faculty; (10) Faculty Survey Breakdown for Community Colleges; (11) Cluster Descriptions; (12) Literature Review on User Profiling; (13) Web TLA [transaction log analysis] Software Package Comparison; (14) Online Website Survey Instrument (from SPIRO site); (15) CSHE Digital Resource Provider Study--Interview Protocol; (16) OER [online educational resources] Meeting--Participants; and (17) OER Meeting--Agenda. (Contains 55 tables and 24 figures.) [Contributions were provided by: Charis Kaskiris and Cara Bautista. Additional funding for this report was provided by: the Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society (CITRIS), the California Digital Library (CDL), and the Vice Chancellor of Research, UC Berkeley.] |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_ED503076 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2006 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | Use and Users of Digital Resources: A Focus on Undergraduate Education in the Humanities and Social Sciences Harley, Diane Henke, Johnathan Lawrence, Shannon Miller, Ian Perciali, Irene Nasatir, David Undergraduate Study Focus Groups Social Sciences Educational Technology Internet Humanities Undergraduate Students Teacher Surveys Access to Information Information Utilization College Faculty Literature Reviews Computer Software Data Analysis Use and Users of Digital Resources: A Focus on Undergraduate Education in the Humanities and Social Sciences Harley, Diane Henke, Johnathan Lawrence, Shannon Miller, Ian Perciali, Irene Nasatir, David Undergraduate Study Focus Groups Social Sciences Educational Technology Internet Humanities Undergraduate Students Teacher Surveys Access to Information Information Utilization College Faculty Literature Reviews Computer Software Data Analysis The purpose of our research was (1) to map the universe of digital resources available to a subset of undergraduate educators in the humanities and social sciences, and (2) to investigate how and if available digital resources are actually being used in undergraduate teaching environments. We employed multiple methods, including surveys and focus groups. Our definition of digital resources was intentionally broad and included rich media objects (e.g., maps, video, images, etc.) as well as text. Appended are: (1) Digital Resources--a Snapshot; (2) Site Owner Advisory Group; (3) CSHE [Center for Studies in Higher Education]/CDL [California Digital Library] Educational Technology & Librarian Meeting Participants; (4) Faculty Survey--Instrument; (5) Faculty Survey--Non-response Interview Protocol; (6) Faculty Survey--Non-response Results Tables; (7) Principal Component Analysis--Factor Matrices; (8) Faculty Survey--Results Tables; (9) Specific Digital Resources Listed by Faculty; (10) Faculty Survey Breakdown for Community Colleges; (11) Cluster Descriptions; (12) Literature Review on User Profiling; (13) Web TLA [transaction log analysis] Software Package Comparison; (14) Online Website Survey Instrument (from SPIRO site); (15) CSHE Digital Resource Provider Study--Interview Protocol; (16) OER [online educational resources] Meeting--Participants; and (17) OER Meeting--Agenda. (Contains 55 tables and 24 figures.) [Contributions were provided by: Charis Kaskiris and Cara Bautista. Additional funding for this report was provided by: the Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society (CITRIS), the California Digital Library (CDL), and the Vice Chancellor of Research, UC Berkeley.] |
| title | Use and Users of Digital Resources: A Focus on Undergraduate Education in the Humanities and Social Sciences |
| topic | Undergraduate Study Focus Groups Social Sciences Educational Technology Internet Humanities Undergraduate Students Teacher Surveys Access to Information Information Utilization College Faculty Literature Reviews Computer Software Data Analysis |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED503076 |