Application of the PICO Process to Plan Treatment for a Child with a Co-Occurring Stuttering and Phonological Disorder. EBP Briefs. Volume 8, Issue 6
Fuente:
ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867181859297820672 |
|---|---|
| author | Koehlinger, Keegan M. Louko, Linda Zebrowski, Patricia |
| author_facet | Koehlinger, Keegan M. Louko, Linda Zebrowski, Patricia Koehlinger, Keegan M. Louko, Linda Zebrowski, Patricia |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | Application of the PICO Process to Plan Treatment for a Child with a Co-Occurring Stuttering and Phonological Disorder. EBP Briefs. Volume 8, Issue 6 Koehlinger, Keegan M. Louko, Linda Zebrowski, Patricia Phonological Awareness Stuttering Literature Reviews Meta Analysis Intervention Outcomes of Treatment Journal Articles Elementary Education Early Childhood Education Evidence Based Practice Incidence Clinical Question: What treatment approaches are available to reduce the frequency of phonological processes and disfluencies (moments of stuttering or stuttered words or syllables) in a school-aged child with a phonological disorder (PD) and an additional stuttering disorder (SD)? Additionally, what is the treatment efficacy of available approaches? Method: Systematic Review. Study Sources: ERIC, ASHA, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, PubMed, Google Scholar, and speechBITE. Search Terms: phonology, stuttering, and intervention approaches. Number of Studies Included: 6. Primary Results: (1) Therapy should be conducted in a concurrent or blended fashion. (2) The portion of intervention that addresses PD should be indirect in nature. (3) The portion of intervention that addresses SD should be direct in nature. (4) A phonological process approach should be used in conjunction with fluency modification techniques. Conclusions: There is a desperate need to further examine treatment efficacy for children with PD and SD. To date, there is one empirical research study that established whether children improved with a blended, simultaneous approach (Conture, Louko, & Edwards, 1993). Furthermore, there is a documented uneasiness in treating children with both PD and SD due to the lack of available treatment information (Unicomb, Hewat, Spencer, & Harrison, 2013). |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_ED583851 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | Application of the PICO Process to Plan Treatment for a Child with a Co-Occurring Stuttering and Phonological Disorder. EBP Briefs. Volume 8, Issue 6 Koehlinger, Keegan M. Louko, Linda Zebrowski, Patricia Phonological Awareness Stuttering Literature Reviews Meta Analysis Intervention Outcomes of Treatment Journal Articles Elementary Education Early Childhood Education Evidence Based Practice Incidence Application of the PICO Process to Plan Treatment for a Child with a Co-Occurring Stuttering and Phonological Disorder. EBP Briefs. Volume 8, Issue 6 Koehlinger, Keegan M. Louko, Linda Zebrowski, Patricia Phonological Awareness Stuttering Literature Reviews Meta Analysis Intervention Outcomes of Treatment Journal Articles Elementary Education Early Childhood Education Evidence Based Practice Incidence Clinical Question: What treatment approaches are available to reduce the frequency of phonological processes and disfluencies (moments of stuttering or stuttered words or syllables) in a school-aged child with a phonological disorder (PD) and an additional stuttering disorder (SD)? Additionally, what is the treatment efficacy of available approaches? Method: Systematic Review. Study Sources: ERIC, ASHA, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, PubMed, Google Scholar, and speechBITE. Search Terms: phonology, stuttering, and intervention approaches. Number of Studies Included: 6. Primary Results: (1) Therapy should be conducted in a concurrent or blended fashion. (2) The portion of intervention that addresses PD should be indirect in nature. (3) The portion of intervention that addresses SD should be direct in nature. (4) A phonological process approach should be used in conjunction with fluency modification techniques. Conclusions: There is a desperate need to further examine treatment efficacy for children with PD and SD. To date, there is one empirical research study that established whether children improved with a blended, simultaneous approach (Conture, Louko, & Edwards, 1993). Furthermore, there is a documented uneasiness in treating children with both PD and SD due to the lack of available treatment information (Unicomb, Hewat, Spencer, & Harrison, 2013). |
| title | Application of the PICO Process to Plan Treatment for a Child with a Co-Occurring Stuttering and Phonological Disorder. EBP Briefs. Volume 8, Issue 6 |
| topic | Phonological Awareness Stuttering Literature Reviews Meta Analysis Intervention Outcomes of Treatment Journal Articles Elementary Education Early Childhood Education Evidence Based Practice Incidence |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED583851 |