Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Scott Zimmer
Formato: Recurso educativo Open Access
Lenguaje:en
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED642637
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1867181502403444736
author Scott Zimmer
author_facet Scott Zimmer
Scott Zimmer
collection Education Resources Information Center
contents Workplace Bullying in Academic Libraries Scott Zimmer Bullying Work Environment Academic Libraries Antisocial Behavior Conflict Group Dynamics Employment Level At Risk Persons Mental Health Library Personnel Librarians Attitudes This study focuses on the familiar topic of workplace bullying, but in a context where it is unexpected: academic libraries. While typically thought of us serene refuges of intellectual pursuit, academic libraries can play host to rivalries, pressures, and incivility in the same manner as is seen in courtrooms, locker rooms, and boardrooms. The university setting and the forces of academic positionality are surprisingly effective at creating opportunities for workplace bullying. In a scenario where there are continuous interactions between four main groups - faculty, staff, administrators, and students - staff have traditionally been overlooked, and are the most vulnerable. Their vulnerability stems from the fact that they often do not enjoy the protections of tenure that faculty possess, they do not have the organizational authority of administrators, and there is no financial incentive connected with their presence on campus, as there is for students. It is certainly true that there are many nuances glossed over by categorization into these four constituencies. There are different types of students with different needs and perspectives - graduate students, undergraduates, etc. There are different types of faculty as well: associate, adjunct, contingent, and so forth. Yet the fact remains that research is mainly conducted by faculty, and that research focuses disproportionately on faculty and student experiences. The present study seeks to rectify this by inquiring into the experiences of academic librarians and library staff with regard to workplace bullying, whether as target or perpetrator. College and university librarians and library staff were surveyed about their demographics, their mental health and feelings of self-efficacy, and their exposure to workplace bullying. One surprising finding from the responses is that persons who had been in their job for a longer period had a higher likelihood of being the target of workplace bullying. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]
format Recurso educativo Open Access
id eric_ED642637
institution ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
language en
publishDate 2022
record_format eric
spellingShingle Workplace Bullying in Academic Libraries
Scott Zimmer
Bullying
Work Environment
Academic Libraries
Antisocial Behavior
Conflict
Group Dynamics
Employment Level
At Risk Persons
Mental Health
Library Personnel
Librarians
Attitudes
Workplace Bullying in Academic Libraries Scott Zimmer Bullying Work Environment Academic Libraries Antisocial Behavior Conflict Group Dynamics Employment Level At Risk Persons Mental Health Library Personnel Librarians Attitudes This study focuses on the familiar topic of workplace bullying, but in a context where it is unexpected: academic libraries. While typically thought of us serene refuges of intellectual pursuit, academic libraries can play host to rivalries, pressures, and incivility in the same manner as is seen in courtrooms, locker rooms, and boardrooms. The university setting and the forces of academic positionality are surprisingly effective at creating opportunities for workplace bullying. In a scenario where there are continuous interactions between four main groups - faculty, staff, administrators, and students - staff have traditionally been overlooked, and are the most vulnerable. Their vulnerability stems from the fact that they often do not enjoy the protections of tenure that faculty possess, they do not have the organizational authority of administrators, and there is no financial incentive connected with their presence on campus, as there is for students. It is certainly true that there are many nuances glossed over by categorization into these four constituencies. There are different types of students with different needs and perspectives - graduate students, undergraduates, etc. There are different types of faculty as well: associate, adjunct, contingent, and so forth. Yet the fact remains that research is mainly conducted by faculty, and that research focuses disproportionately on faculty and student experiences. The present study seeks to rectify this by inquiring into the experiences of academic librarians and library staff with regard to workplace bullying, whether as target or perpetrator. College and university librarians and library staff were surveyed about their demographics, their mental health and feelings of self-efficacy, and their exposure to workplace bullying. One surprising finding from the responses is that persons who had been in their job for a longer period had a higher likelihood of being the target of workplace bullying. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]
title Workplace Bullying in Academic Libraries
topic Bullying
Work Environment
Academic Libraries
Antisocial Behavior
Conflict
Group Dynamics
Employment Level
At Risk Persons
Mental Health
Library Personnel
Librarians
Attitudes
url https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED642637