Evaluation of Interoperability Protocols in Repositories of Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Fuente: ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hakimjavadi, Hesamedin, Masrek, Mohamad Noorman
Format: Recurso educativo Open Access
Language:en
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867181891728179200
author Hakimjavadi, Hesamedin
Masrek, Mohamad Noorman
author_facet Hakimjavadi, Hesamedin
Masrek, Mohamad Noorman
Hakimjavadi, Hesamedin
Masrek, Mohamad Noorman
collection Education Resources Information Center
contents Evaluation of Interoperability Protocols in Repositories of Electronic Theses and Dissertations Hakimjavadi, Hesamedin Masrek, Mohamad Noorman Electronic Libraries Theses Information Systems Computer Software Standards Mixed Methods Research Surveys Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the status of eight interoperability protocols within repositories of electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) as an introduction to further studies on feasibility of deploying these protocols in upcoming areas of interoperability. Design/methodology/approach: Three surveys of 266 ETD repositories, 15 common ETD management software solutions, and 136 ETD experts were conducted in order to appraise the protocols. These protocols were evaluated in four categories of aggregation, syndication, distributed search, and publishing protocols. Findings: This study revealed that, despite its drawbacks, Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (PMH) is still the most utilized interoperability protocol within ETD providers, ETD software developers, and implementers, followed by ATOM and Object Reuse and Exchange (ORE) protocols. However, in all competitive areas related to performance and functionality, ORE surpasses other protocols. It was also found that the three protocols of ATOM, PMH, and ORE could be used interchangeably in the most used cases of interoperability protocols in repositories. Practical implications: In this research, a combination of methods was employed to evaluate the status of protocols, from the perspectives of data providers, software providers, and implementers. Practitioners may use these methods to assess other protocols in terms of effectiveness and efficiency. Originality/value: The conduct of this study has involved three types of surveys, through which different aspects of interoperability protocols are evaluated. Prior to the conduct of this study, there has yet any study focusing on the same topic, which has adopted the multi-method that has been adopted in this study. (Contains 9 tables and 16 figures.)
format Recurso educativo Open Access
id eric_EJ1004424
institution ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
language en
publishDate 2013
record_format eric
spellingShingle Evaluation of Interoperability Protocols in Repositories of Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Hakimjavadi, Hesamedin
Masrek, Mohamad Noorman
Electronic Libraries
Theses
Information Systems
Computer Software
Standards
Mixed Methods Research
Surveys
Evaluation of Interoperability Protocols in Repositories of Electronic Theses and Dissertations Hakimjavadi, Hesamedin Masrek, Mohamad Noorman Electronic Libraries Theses Information Systems Computer Software Standards Mixed Methods Research Surveys Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the status of eight interoperability protocols within repositories of electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) as an introduction to further studies on feasibility of deploying these protocols in upcoming areas of interoperability. Design/methodology/approach: Three surveys of 266 ETD repositories, 15 common ETD management software solutions, and 136 ETD experts were conducted in order to appraise the protocols. These protocols were evaluated in four categories of aggregation, syndication, distributed search, and publishing protocols. Findings: This study revealed that, despite its drawbacks, Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (PMH) is still the most utilized interoperability protocol within ETD providers, ETD software developers, and implementers, followed by ATOM and Object Reuse and Exchange (ORE) protocols. However, in all competitive areas related to performance and functionality, ORE surpasses other protocols. It was also found that the three protocols of ATOM, PMH, and ORE could be used interchangeably in the most used cases of interoperability protocols in repositories. Practical implications: In this research, a combination of methods was employed to evaluate the status of protocols, from the perspectives of data providers, software providers, and implementers. Practitioners may use these methods to assess other protocols in terms of effectiveness and efficiency. Originality/value: The conduct of this study has involved three types of surveys, through which different aspects of interoperability protocols are evaluated. Prior to the conduct of this study, there has yet any study focusing on the same topic, which has adopted the multi-method that has been adopted in this study. (Contains 9 tables and 16 figures.)
title Evaluation of Interoperability Protocols in Repositories of Electronic Theses and Dissertations
topic Electronic Libraries
Theses
Information Systems
Computer Software
Standards
Mixed Methods Research
Surveys
url https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1004424