Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Lingua: | en |
| Pubblicazione: |
2015
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1089100 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1867181312107872256 |
|---|---|
| author | Dempsey, Megan E. Dalal, Heather Dokus, Lynee R. Charles, Leslin H. Scharf, Davida |
| author_facet | Dempsey, Megan E. Dalal, Heather Dokus, Lynee R. Charles, Leslin H. Scharf, Davida Dempsey, Megan E. Dalal, Heather Dokus, Lynee R. Charles, Leslin H. Scharf, Davida |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | Continuing the Conversation: Questions about the "Framework" Dempsey, Megan E. Dalal, Heather Dokus, Lynee R. Charles, Leslin H. Scharf, Davida Information Literacy Library Instruction Academic Libraries Library Associations Academic Standards Models Advocacy Organizational Development Student Evaluation Curriculum Design Workplace Literacy Educational Practices Performance Factors This essay raises questions about the future of information literacy in higher education, given the prevalence of the "Information Literacy Competency Standards" in the library profession for the past 15 years, and the heated debate that took place regarding whether the "Framework for Information Literacy" and the "Standards" could harmoniously co-exist. We do not have answers to these questions, but we offer our perspectives on how the "Standards" have served academic librarians in the past and on how we envision the "Framework" and the "Standards" working together to further information literacy instruction. Our conclusion is that the "Framework" and the "Standards" serve different purposes and have different intended audiences and are thus both valuable to the profession. |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_EJ1089100 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | Continuing the Conversation: Questions about the "Framework" Dempsey, Megan E. Dalal, Heather Dokus, Lynee R. Charles, Leslin H. Scharf, Davida Information Literacy Library Instruction Academic Libraries Library Associations Academic Standards Models Advocacy Organizational Development Student Evaluation Curriculum Design Workplace Literacy Educational Practices Performance Factors Continuing the Conversation: Questions about the "Framework" Dempsey, Megan E. Dalal, Heather Dokus, Lynee R. Charles, Leslin H. Scharf, Davida Information Literacy Library Instruction Academic Libraries Library Associations Academic Standards Models Advocacy Organizational Development Student Evaluation Curriculum Design Workplace Literacy Educational Practices Performance Factors This essay raises questions about the future of information literacy in higher education, given the prevalence of the "Information Literacy Competency Standards" in the library profession for the past 15 years, and the heated debate that took place regarding whether the "Framework for Information Literacy" and the "Standards" could harmoniously co-exist. We do not have answers to these questions, but we offer our perspectives on how the "Standards" have served academic librarians in the past and on how we envision the "Framework" and the "Standards" working together to further information literacy instruction. Our conclusion is that the "Framework" and the "Standards" serve different purposes and have different intended audiences and are thus both valuable to the profession. |
| title | Continuing the Conversation: Questions about the "Framework" |
| topic | Information Literacy Library Instruction Academic Libraries Library Associations Academic Standards Models Advocacy Organizational Development Student Evaluation Curriculum Design Workplace Literacy Educational Practices Performance Factors |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1089100 |