Buchumschlag

How to Decide Whether a Systematic Review Is Stable and Not in Need of Updating: Analysis of Cochrane Reviews

Fuente: ERIC Institute of Education Sciences

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser:	Babic, Andrija, Poklepovic Pericic, Tina, Pieper, Dawid, Puljak, Livia
Format:	Recurso educativo Open Access
Sprache:	en
Veröffentlicht:	2020
Schlagworte:	Literature Reviews Research Problems Synthesis Evidence
Online-Zugang:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Ähnliche Einträge

Evolving use of the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool in biomedical systematic reviews
von: Livia Puljak, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

A Scoping Approach to Systematically Review Published Reviews: Adaptations and Recommendations
von: Schultz, Annette, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2018)

The new rehabilitation definition for research purposes could improve rehabilitation description in Cochrane Systematic Reviews
von: Irene Battel, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Cochrane's COVID‐19 Living Systematic Reviews: A Mixed‐Methods Study of Their Conduct, Reporting and Currency
von: Kevindu De Silva, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Saying 'Yes' and 'No:' Developing and Implementing a Single-Librarian Social Science Evidence Synthesis Service
von: Julia Anne Maxwell
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Evidence Synthesis: An Investigation of Methods Employed in Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration, and Environmental Evidence Reviews
von: Kristen L. Scotti, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Do We Need Systematic Reviews of Research Priority Setting? A Proposal for a New Concept on Conducting Systematic Reviews of Research Priority Setting Exercises
von: Mona Nasser, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Analysis of Cochrane systematic reviews: A comprehensive study of impact and influence from 1998 to 2024
von: Amin Sharifan
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Coproducing a Cochrane Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Process, Outcomes, and Reflections on Power
von: Bronwen Merner, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Health Equity in Systematic Reviews: A Tutorial—Part 1 Getting Started With Health Equity in Your Review
von: Jennifer Petkovic, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Correction to “Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Evidence Synthesis: An Investigation of Methods Employed in Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration, and Environmental Evidence Reviews,” “Creating Interactive Data Dashboards for Evidence Syntheses,” and “Using GPT‐4 for Title and Abstract Screening in a Literature Review of Public Policies: A Feasibility Study”
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Promoting the Implementation of Co‐Produced Cochrane Evidence: An Exploratory Study of Improving Partnering With Consumers
von: Bronwen Merner, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

RETRACTED: Human‐in‐the‐Loop Artificial Intelligence System for Systematic Literature Review: Methods and Validations for the AutoLit Review Software
von: Kevin M. Kallmes, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Using Large Language Models to Address Contextual Questions in Systematic Reviews
von: Susanne Hempel, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Split Body Trials in Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses: A Tutorial
von: Nuala Livingstone, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

A simple form could prevent authorship issues in Cochrane manuscripts: A cohort study
von: Siv Fonnes, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Publication barriers and facilitators of Cochrane authors in sub‐Saharan Africa: A mixed‐methods study
von: Idriss I. Kallon, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Identification of Problems in Search Strategies in Cochrane Reviews
von: Franco, Juan Víctor Ariel, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2018)

Mechanical ventilation core outcome set uptake in Cochrane systematic reviews: A cross‐sectional study
von: Luis Garegnani, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Analyzing the Utility of Openalex to Identify Studies for Systematic Reviews: Methods and a Case Study
von: Claire Stansfield, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Influence of Social and Demographic Factors on Retinoblastoma Outcomes in the United States: A Systematic Review
von: Vijay Joshi, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Retrieving Cochrane Reviews Is Sometimes Challenging and Their Reporting Is Not Always Optimal
von: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2022)

Harnessing Large‐Language Models for Efficient Data Extraction in Systematic Reviews: The Role of Prompt Engineering
von: Molly Murton, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

The Impact on Systematic Reviews of Risk of Bias Assessment Changes From Conference Abstracts to Full Text
von: Ryan P. W. Kenny, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

The Campbell Collaboration: Providing Better Evidence for a Better World
von: Littell, Julia H., et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2018)

Systematic Reviews as Part of Doctoral Theses and for the Promotion to Associate Professor: A Descriptive Study of University Policies in Sweden
von: Martin Ringsten, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

A New Process Model of Study Identification Specific to the Identification of Randomised Studies for Systematic Reviews of Medical Interventions
von: Chris Cooper, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

An evaluation of the recommendations for primary nutrition research addressing noncommunicable disease using the EPICOT+ framework: A cross‐sectional descriptive meta‐research study of Cochrane nutrition systematic reviews
von: Sheena Ruzive, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Impact of a Research Integrity Assessment (RIA) of Randomized Controlled Trials Included in Interventional COVID‐19 Systematic Reviews: A Meta‐Epidemiological Study
von: Stephanie Weibel, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Don't Stop Me Now, `Cause I'm Having a Good Time Screening: Evaluation of Stopping Methods for Safe Use of Priority Screening in Systematic Reviews
von: Tim Repke, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Methods of Engaging Interest‐Holders in Healthcare Evidence Syntheses: A Scoping Review
von: Alex Todhunter‐Brown, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Using GPT‐4 for Title and Abstract Screening in a Literature Review of Public Policies: A Feasibility Study
von: Max Rubinstein, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Ninety‐Seven Percent of Trials Investigating Robotic Interventions in Physiotherapy Contained Abstract Spin: A Meta‐Research Review
von: Hilary Tier, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Assessing the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Bespoke Large Language Model Pipeline to Extract Data From Different Study Designs for Public Health Evidence Reviews
von: Zalaya Simmons, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Better Together: Tools to Aid Patient and Public Involvement in Evidence Synthesis and the Need for Consensus on Essential Reporting Items
von: Eugenie Evelynne Johnson, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Using a Large Language Model (ChatGPT‐4o) to Assess the Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Medical Interventions: Interrater Agreement With Human Reviewers
von: Christopher James Rose, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Systematic reviews of clinical laboratory studies: Pilot risk of bias tool developed by consensus
von: Tilly Fox, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Sensitivity Analysis in Meta‐Analysis: A Tutorial
von: Nyan Min Aung, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Meta‐Analysis Using Time‐to‐Event Data: A Tutorial
von: Ashma Krishan, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Artificial Intelligence Search Tools for Evidence Synthesis: Comparative Analysis and Implementation Recommendations
von: Robin Featherstone, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)