Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Lingua: | en |
| Pubblicazione: |
2022
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1347968 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1867181689966428160 |
|---|---|
| author | Pieper, Dawid Hoffmann, Falk |
| author_facet | Pieper, Dawid Hoffmann, Falk Pieper, Dawid Hoffmann, Falk |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | Retrieving Cochrane Reviews Is Sometimes Challenging and Their Reporting Is Not Always Optimal Pieper, Dawid Hoffmann, Falk Evidence Health Services Decision Making Medical Research Guidelines Databases Research Reports Indexing Epidemiology Cochrane reviews are known to be a high-quality source of evidence synthesis supporting health care decisions. In a recently conducted study, we analyzed the trends in epidemiology and reporting of published systematic reviews over the last 20 years. This sample of 1132 systematic reviews included 84 Cochrane reviews. We have learned several peculiarities of Cochrane reviews that are worth being discussed in more detail due to their practical implications. Methodologists, clinicians and health care professionals should be aware of these limitations: (1) Cochrane reviews are not identified as systematic reviews in title, (2) Cochrane reviews do not always follow PRISMA reporting guidelines, (3) Some updates are only available via the Cochrane Library, and (4) Indexing of Cochrane reviews in PubMed may be suboptimal. |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_EJ1347968 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | Retrieving Cochrane Reviews Is Sometimes Challenging and Their Reporting Is Not Always Optimal Pieper, Dawid Hoffmann, Falk Evidence Health Services Decision Making Medical Research Guidelines Databases Research Reports Indexing Epidemiology Retrieving Cochrane Reviews Is Sometimes Challenging and Their Reporting Is Not Always Optimal Pieper, Dawid Hoffmann, Falk Evidence Health Services Decision Making Medical Research Guidelines Databases Research Reports Indexing Epidemiology Cochrane reviews are known to be a high-quality source of evidence synthesis supporting health care decisions. In a recently conducted study, we analyzed the trends in epidemiology and reporting of published systematic reviews over the last 20 years. This sample of 1132 systematic reviews included 84 Cochrane reviews. We have learned several peculiarities of Cochrane reviews that are worth being discussed in more detail due to their practical implications. Methodologists, clinicians and health care professionals should be aware of these limitations: (1) Cochrane reviews are not identified as systematic reviews in title, (2) Cochrane reviews do not always follow PRISMA reporting guidelines, (3) Some updates are only available via the Cochrane Library, and (4) Indexing of Cochrane reviews in PubMed may be suboptimal. |
| title | Retrieving Cochrane Reviews Is Sometimes Challenging and Their Reporting Is Not Always Optimal |
| topic | Evidence Health Services Decision Making Medical Research Guidelines Databases Research Reports Indexing Epidemiology |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1347968 |