Insight into Faculty Open Access Perceptions: A Quantitative Analysis among UAE Faculty
Fuente:
ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867181881529729024 |
|---|---|
| author | Jeniece Tyria Lusk Kara Jones Alanna Ross Veronique Lecat |
| author_facet | Jeniece Tyria Lusk Kara Jones Alanna Ross Veronique Lecat Jeniece Tyria Lusk Kara Jones Alanna Ross Veronique Lecat |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | Insight into Faculty Open Access Perceptions: A Quantitative Analysis among UAE Faculty Jeniece Tyria Lusk Kara Jones Alanna Ross Veronique Lecat Foreign Countries Access to Information College Faculty Teacher Researchers Librarians Librarian Attitudes Electronic Publishing Teacher Attitudes Ethics Reputation Deception Credibility Electronic Journals Scholarship Communication (Thought Transfer) Barriers Opportunities Open access (OA) publishing presents university librarians, administrators, and faculty researchers with a paradox of both opportunities and challenges. For faculty researchers in particular, the decision of whether to pursue OA publication of their scholarship is driven by their perceptions of the credibility and quality of OA publishing. While there is a variety of extant literature broaching these perceptions, there are few quantitative analyses with an n greater than 100 respondents, and a notable lack of research in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This study mitigates this gap in scholarship regarding OA publishing, offering a quantitative analysis of a survey sample of 134 UAE faculty researchers. We find statistically significant findings regarding the relationship between one's position on OA and length of publishing career and professorial rank. Similarly, we find that those with favourable views of OA publishing are more likely to believe that OA journals are peer reviewed, increase likelihood of being cited, allow authors to repost content, and are a more principled alternative to traditional publishers. Those who believe that their research should be freely available to all readers or that OA publishing broadens their research impact were also highly likely to hold favourable views of OA publishing. Finally, our findings suggest that support for OA publishing at the departmental and institutional level remains ambiguous, with findings yielding contradicting results on the matter. The study contributes to content regarding scholarship, library science, and university administration. |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_EJ1410685 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | Insight into Faculty Open Access Perceptions: A Quantitative Analysis among UAE Faculty Jeniece Tyria Lusk Kara Jones Alanna Ross Veronique Lecat Foreign Countries Access to Information College Faculty Teacher Researchers Librarians Librarian Attitudes Electronic Publishing Teacher Attitudes Ethics Reputation Deception Credibility Electronic Journals Scholarship Communication (Thought Transfer) Barriers Opportunities Insight into Faculty Open Access Perceptions: A Quantitative Analysis among UAE Faculty Jeniece Tyria Lusk Kara Jones Alanna Ross Veronique Lecat Foreign Countries Access to Information College Faculty Teacher Researchers Librarians Librarian Attitudes Electronic Publishing Teacher Attitudes Ethics Reputation Deception Credibility Electronic Journals Scholarship Communication (Thought Transfer) Barriers Opportunities Open access (OA) publishing presents university librarians, administrators, and faculty researchers with a paradox of both opportunities and challenges. For faculty researchers in particular, the decision of whether to pursue OA publication of their scholarship is driven by their perceptions of the credibility and quality of OA publishing. While there is a variety of extant literature broaching these perceptions, there are few quantitative analyses with an n greater than 100 respondents, and a notable lack of research in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This study mitigates this gap in scholarship regarding OA publishing, offering a quantitative analysis of a survey sample of 134 UAE faculty researchers. We find statistically significant findings regarding the relationship between one's position on OA and length of publishing career and professorial rank. Similarly, we find that those with favourable views of OA publishing are more likely to believe that OA journals are peer reviewed, increase likelihood of being cited, allow authors to repost content, and are a more principled alternative to traditional publishers. Those who believe that their research should be freely available to all readers or that OA publishing broadens their research impact were also highly likely to hold favourable views of OA publishing. Finally, our findings suggest that support for OA publishing at the departmental and institutional level remains ambiguous, with findings yielding contradicting results on the matter. The study contributes to content regarding scholarship, library science, and university administration. |
| title | Insight into Faculty Open Access Perceptions: A Quantitative Analysis among UAE Faculty |
| topic | Foreign Countries Access to Information College Faculty Teacher Researchers Librarians Librarian Attitudes Electronic Publishing Teacher Attitudes Ethics Reputation Deception Credibility Electronic Journals Scholarship Communication (Thought Transfer) Barriers Opportunities |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1410685 |