Financial and Other Perceived Barriers to Transitioning to an Equitable No-Publishing Fee Open Access Model: A Survey of LIS Journal Editors
Fuente:
ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Lingua: | en |
| Pubblicazione: |
2024
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1867181397328789504 |
|---|---|
| author | Rachel Borchardt Teresa Schultz DeDe Dawson |
| author_facet | Rachel Borchardt Teresa Schultz DeDe Dawson Rachel Borchardt Teresa Schultz DeDe Dawson |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | Financial and Other Perceived Barriers to Transitioning to an Equitable No-Publishing Fee Open Access Model: A Survey of LIS Journal Editors Rachel Borchardt Teresa Schultz DeDe Dawson Editing Library Science Information Science Access to Information Electronic Publishing Electronic Journals Fees Decision Making Finance Reform Employee Attitudes Budgets Knowledge Level Publishing Industry About half of Library and Information Science (LIS) journals continue to charge authors to publish articles open access (OA) or do not offer OA publishing at all. To further investigate the financial and other perceived barriers preventing these LIS journals from transitioning to no-publishing fee OA models, this exploratory project surveyed lead editors for each identified LIS journal. Results indicate most of the journals have not discussed transitioning to a no-publishing fee OA model, and that finances are the main barrier. Most also indicated a lack of awareness of their journal's budget. The most popular no-publishing fee OA model was Subscribe to Open. |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_EJ1413038 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | Financial and Other Perceived Barriers to Transitioning to an Equitable No-Publishing Fee Open Access Model: A Survey of LIS Journal Editors Rachel Borchardt Teresa Schultz DeDe Dawson Editing Library Science Information Science Access to Information Electronic Publishing Electronic Journals Fees Decision Making Finance Reform Employee Attitudes Budgets Knowledge Level Publishing Industry Financial and Other Perceived Barriers to Transitioning to an Equitable No-Publishing Fee Open Access Model: A Survey of LIS Journal Editors Rachel Borchardt Teresa Schultz DeDe Dawson Editing Library Science Information Science Access to Information Electronic Publishing Electronic Journals Fees Decision Making Finance Reform Employee Attitudes Budgets Knowledge Level Publishing Industry About half of Library and Information Science (LIS) journals continue to charge authors to publish articles open access (OA) or do not offer OA publishing at all. To further investigate the financial and other perceived barriers preventing these LIS journals from transitioning to no-publishing fee OA models, this exploratory project surveyed lead editors for each identified LIS journal. Results indicate most of the journals have not discussed transitioning to a no-publishing fee OA model, and that finances are the main barrier. Most also indicated a lack of awareness of their journal's budget. The most popular no-publishing fee OA model was Subscribe to Open. |
| title | Financial and Other Perceived Barriers to Transitioning to an Equitable No-Publishing Fee Open Access Model: A Survey of LIS Journal Editors |
| topic | Editing Library Science Information Science Access to Information Electronic Publishing Electronic Journals Fees Decision Making Finance Reform Employee Attitudes Budgets Knowledge Level Publishing Industry |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1413038 |