Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Langue: | en |
| Publié: |
2023
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1413044 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1867181277371695105 |
|---|---|
| author | Tiffanie Lynn Ford-Baxter |
| author_facet | Tiffanie Lynn Ford-Baxter Tiffanie Lynn Ford-Baxter |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | An Exploration of Two Information Literacy Open Learning Object Repositories: Value, Content, and Engagement Tiffanie Lynn Ford-Baxter Information Literacy Librarians Library Instruction Instructional Materials Lesson Plans Standards Open Education Electronic Publishing Academic Libraries Information Networks Communities of Practice Library Science Instructional Development Information literacy (IL) open learning object repositories (LORs) provide a space for librarians to find and exchange instruction resources and lessons. Given many librarians enter the workforce with little or no formal training or educational opportunities to learn about pedagogy, these repositories are indispensable resources to the Library and Information Science field. This study explored the contents of two popular IL LORs, Project Cora and the Association of College and Research Libraries Framework for Information Literacy Sandbox, to uncover how users engage with the resources and how the repositories differ. This study's findings suggest that while resources within the LORs are being used, yearly submissions have stagnated. Intentional assessment of disciplinary and information literacy concept gaps, followed by targeted calls for resources, may improve and increase engagement with the repositories as communities of practice. |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_EJ1413044 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | An Exploration of Two Information Literacy Open Learning Object Repositories: Value, Content, and Engagement Tiffanie Lynn Ford-Baxter Information Literacy Librarians Library Instruction Instructional Materials Lesson Plans Standards Open Education Electronic Publishing Academic Libraries Information Networks Communities of Practice Library Science Instructional Development An Exploration of Two Information Literacy Open Learning Object Repositories: Value, Content, and Engagement Tiffanie Lynn Ford-Baxter Information Literacy Librarians Library Instruction Instructional Materials Lesson Plans Standards Open Education Electronic Publishing Academic Libraries Information Networks Communities of Practice Library Science Instructional Development Information literacy (IL) open learning object repositories (LORs) provide a space for librarians to find and exchange instruction resources and lessons. Given many librarians enter the workforce with little or no formal training or educational opportunities to learn about pedagogy, these repositories are indispensable resources to the Library and Information Science field. This study explored the contents of two popular IL LORs, Project Cora and the Association of College and Research Libraries Framework for Information Literacy Sandbox, to uncover how users engage with the resources and how the repositories differ. This study's findings suggest that while resources within the LORs are being used, yearly submissions have stagnated. Intentional assessment of disciplinary and information literacy concept gaps, followed by targeted calls for resources, may improve and increase engagement with the repositories as communities of practice. |
| title | An Exploration of Two Information Literacy Open Learning Object Repositories: Value, Content, and Engagement |
| topic | Information Literacy Librarians Library Instruction Instructional Materials Lesson Plans Standards Open Education Electronic Publishing Academic Libraries Information Networks Communities of Practice Library Science Instructional Development |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1413044 |