Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1423977 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867181426308284416 |
|---|---|
| author | Mê-Linh Lê Christine J. Neilson Janice Winkler |
| author_facet | Mê-Linh Lê Christine J. Neilson Janice Winkler Mê-Linh Lê Christine J. Neilson Janice Winkler |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | Benchmarking Librarian Support of Systematic Reviews in the Sciences, Humanities, and Social Sciences Mê-Linh Lê Christine J. Neilson Janice Winkler Librarians Sciences Humanities Social Sciences Benchmarking Library Role Library Services User Needs (Information) Literature Reviews Expertise Interpersonal Relationship Researchers Teamwork Consultation Programs Librarian Attitudes Individual Instruction Systematic reviews, along with other types of knowledge synthesis, are a type of research methodology that attempt to find all available evidence on a topic to help answer specific questions. Librarian involvement in systematic reviews is well established in the health sciences, and in recent years there has been growing awareness of, and literature about, librarians outside of health supporting systematic reviews. This study benchmarks librarian support of systematic reviews in the sciences, humanities, and social sciences (SHSS) by looking at the growth of demand for support, the disciplines requesting this kind of librarian support, and the specific types of support needed. It also examines what SHSS librarians need to be successful in this type of work, including administrative support and workload adjustments. |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_EJ1423977 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | Benchmarking Librarian Support of Systematic Reviews in the Sciences, Humanities, and Social Sciences Mê-Linh Lê Christine J. Neilson Janice Winkler Librarians Sciences Humanities Social Sciences Benchmarking Library Role Library Services User Needs (Information) Literature Reviews Expertise Interpersonal Relationship Researchers Teamwork Consultation Programs Librarian Attitudes Individual Instruction Benchmarking Librarian Support of Systematic Reviews in the Sciences, Humanities, and Social Sciences Mê-Linh Lê Christine J. Neilson Janice Winkler Librarians Sciences Humanities Social Sciences Benchmarking Library Role Library Services User Needs (Information) Literature Reviews Expertise Interpersonal Relationship Researchers Teamwork Consultation Programs Librarian Attitudes Individual Instruction Systematic reviews, along with other types of knowledge synthesis, are a type of research methodology that attempt to find all available evidence on a topic to help answer specific questions. Librarian involvement in systematic reviews is well established in the health sciences, and in recent years there has been growing awareness of, and literature about, librarians outside of health supporting systematic reviews. This study benchmarks librarian support of systematic reviews in the sciences, humanities, and social sciences (SHSS) by looking at the growth of demand for support, the disciplines requesting this kind of librarian support, and the specific types of support needed. It also examines what SHSS librarians need to be successful in this type of work, including administrative support and workload adjustments. |
| title | Benchmarking Librarian Support of Systematic Reviews in the Sciences, Humanities, and Social Sciences |
| topic | Librarians Sciences Humanities Social Sciences Benchmarking Library Role Library Services User Needs (Information) Literature Reviews Expertise Interpersonal Relationship Researchers Teamwork Consultation Programs Librarian Attitudes Individual Instruction |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1423977 |