Disciplinary Differences and Scholarly Literature: Faculty Experiences with Discovery, Browsing, and Formats
Fuente:
ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867181364776796160 |
|---|---|
| author | Chad E. Buckley Rachel E. Scott Anne Shelley Cassie Thayer-Styes Julie A. Murphy |
| author_facet | Chad E. Buckley Rachel E. Scott Anne Shelley Cassie Thayer-Styes Julie A. Murphy Chad E. Buckley Rachel E. Scott Anne Shelley Cassie Thayer-Styes Julie A. Murphy |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | Disciplinary Differences and Scholarly Literature: Faculty Experiences with Discovery, Browsing, and Formats Chad E. Buckley Rachel E. Scott Anne Shelley Cassie Thayer-Styes Julie A. Murphy Intellectual Disciplines Scholarship Writing (Composition) Periodicals College Faculty Discovery Processes Information Seeking Research Universities Teacher Attitudes Public Colleges User Needs (Information) Academic Libraries Information Sources Online Catalogs Bibliographic Databases Library Materials Access to Information This study reports faculty experiences regarding the discovery of scholarly content, highlighting similarities and differences across a range of academic disciplines. The authors interviewed twenty-five faculty members at a public, high-research university in the Midwest to explore the intersections of discovery, browsing, and format from diverse disciplinary perspectives. Although most participants rely on similar discovery tools such as library catalogs and databases and Google Scholar, their discovery techniques varied according to the discipline and type of research being done. Browsing is not a standard method for discovery, but it is still done selectively and strategically by some scholars. Journal articles are the most important format across disciplines, but books, chapters, and conference proceedings are core for some scholars and should be considered when facilitating discovery. The findings detail several ways in which disciplinary and personal experiences shape scholars' practices. The authors discuss the perceived disconnect between browsability, discovery, and access of scholarly literature and explore solutions that make the library central to discovery and browsing. |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_EJ1444915 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | Disciplinary Differences and Scholarly Literature: Faculty Experiences with Discovery, Browsing, and Formats Chad E. Buckley Rachel E. Scott Anne Shelley Cassie Thayer-Styes Julie A. Murphy Intellectual Disciplines Scholarship Writing (Composition) Periodicals College Faculty Discovery Processes Information Seeking Research Universities Teacher Attitudes Public Colleges User Needs (Information) Academic Libraries Information Sources Online Catalogs Bibliographic Databases Library Materials Access to Information Disciplinary Differences and Scholarly Literature: Faculty Experiences with Discovery, Browsing, and Formats Chad E. Buckley Rachel E. Scott Anne Shelley Cassie Thayer-Styes Julie A. Murphy Intellectual Disciplines Scholarship Writing (Composition) Periodicals College Faculty Discovery Processes Information Seeking Research Universities Teacher Attitudes Public Colleges User Needs (Information) Academic Libraries Information Sources Online Catalogs Bibliographic Databases Library Materials Access to Information This study reports faculty experiences regarding the discovery of scholarly content, highlighting similarities and differences across a range of academic disciplines. The authors interviewed twenty-five faculty members at a public, high-research university in the Midwest to explore the intersections of discovery, browsing, and format from diverse disciplinary perspectives. Although most participants rely on similar discovery tools such as library catalogs and databases and Google Scholar, their discovery techniques varied according to the discipline and type of research being done. Browsing is not a standard method for discovery, but it is still done selectively and strategically by some scholars. Journal articles are the most important format across disciplines, but books, chapters, and conference proceedings are core for some scholars and should be considered when facilitating discovery. The findings detail several ways in which disciplinary and personal experiences shape scholars' practices. The authors discuss the perceived disconnect between browsability, discovery, and access of scholarly literature and explore solutions that make the library central to discovery and browsing. |
| title | Disciplinary Differences and Scholarly Literature: Faculty Experiences with Discovery, Browsing, and Formats |
| topic | Intellectual Disciplines Scholarship Writing (Composition) Periodicals College Faculty Discovery Processes Information Seeking Research Universities Teacher Attitudes Public Colleges User Needs (Information) Academic Libraries Information Sources Online Catalogs Bibliographic Databases Library Materials Access to Information |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1444915 |