Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Sharon Markless, David Streatfield
Format: Recurso educativo Open Access
Sprache:en
Veröffentlicht: 2017
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1467181
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867181304365187073
author Sharon Markless
David Streatfield
author_facet Sharon Markless
David Streatfield
Sharon Markless
David Streatfield
collection Education Resources Information Center
contents How Can You Tell if It's Working? Recent Developments in Impact Evaluation and Their Implications for Information Literacy Practice Sharon Markless David Streatfield Information Literacy Instructional Effectiveness Trend Analysis Library Science Information Science Education Library Education Program Evaluation Expertise Library Instruction Librarians Medical Libraries School Libraries Special Libraries Academic Libraries Public Libraries This paper surveys the (patchy and uneven) advances in LIS impact evaluation over the past ten years and notes the surge forward in public library impact evaluation, before looking more broadly at the international and educational impact evaluation scene and noting the advance of programme-theory driven approaches. The authors then identify various trends drawn from the wider evaluation discourse that they think are likely to be relevant to Information literacy (IL) practitioners, academic staff, employers and others who are concerned with impact evaluation of IL work. The trends identified are: (1) growing clarity about the levels of evaluation expertise needed to deliver information literacy support from the perspectives of leaders of LIS education programmes, staff of academic institutions, library leaders and managers and IL practitioners; (2) growing interest in more inclusive or democratic approaches to impact evaluation; (3) the limitations of the simple logic model of evaluation; (4) re-purposing of existing data to meet new evaluation needs; (5) collecting and presenting stories of change as impact evaluation evidence. Implications for IL practitioners are offered in relation to each of these trends. The authors predict that over the next ten years there will be a strong focus on whether IL interventions are having an impact in combating misinformation and disinformation; more systematic and sustained approaches to IL impact evaluation in the health and higher education sectors but less so in some school libraries and other settings. They think that the more proactive public libraries will adopt IL evaluation approaches, that workplace IL will continue to depend upon the organisational culture, and that research on information seeking in context will shed light on evaluation priorities. Finally, they hope that future IL work will be underpinned by programme theory-based evaluation.
format Recurso educativo Open Access
id eric_EJ1467181
institution ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
language en
publishDate 2017
record_format eric
spellingShingle How Can You Tell if It's Working? Recent Developments in Impact Evaluation and Their Implications for Information Literacy Practice
Sharon Markless
David Streatfield
Information Literacy
Instructional Effectiveness
Trend Analysis
Library Science
Information Science Education
Library Education
Program Evaluation
Expertise
Library Instruction
Librarians
Medical Libraries
School Libraries
Special Libraries
Academic Libraries
Public Libraries
How Can You Tell if It's Working? Recent Developments in Impact Evaluation and Their Implications for Information Literacy Practice Sharon Markless David Streatfield Information Literacy Instructional Effectiveness Trend Analysis Library Science Information Science Education Library Education Program Evaluation Expertise Library Instruction Librarians Medical Libraries School Libraries Special Libraries Academic Libraries Public Libraries This paper surveys the (patchy and uneven) advances in LIS impact evaluation over the past ten years and notes the surge forward in public library impact evaluation, before looking more broadly at the international and educational impact evaluation scene and noting the advance of programme-theory driven approaches. The authors then identify various trends drawn from the wider evaluation discourse that they think are likely to be relevant to Information literacy (IL) practitioners, academic staff, employers and others who are concerned with impact evaluation of IL work. The trends identified are: (1) growing clarity about the levels of evaluation expertise needed to deliver information literacy support from the perspectives of leaders of LIS education programmes, staff of academic institutions, library leaders and managers and IL practitioners; (2) growing interest in more inclusive or democratic approaches to impact evaluation; (3) the limitations of the simple logic model of evaluation; (4) re-purposing of existing data to meet new evaluation needs; (5) collecting and presenting stories of change as impact evaluation evidence. Implications for IL practitioners are offered in relation to each of these trends. The authors predict that over the next ten years there will be a strong focus on whether IL interventions are having an impact in combating misinformation and disinformation; more systematic and sustained approaches to IL impact evaluation in the health and higher education sectors but less so in some school libraries and other settings. They think that the more proactive public libraries will adopt IL evaluation approaches, that workplace IL will continue to depend upon the organisational culture, and that research on information seeking in context will shed light on evaluation priorities. Finally, they hope that future IL work will be underpinned by programme theory-based evaluation.
title How Can You Tell if It's Working? Recent Developments in Impact Evaluation and Their Implications for Information Literacy Practice
topic Information Literacy
Instructional Effectiveness
Trend Analysis
Library Science
Information Science Education
Library Education
Program Evaluation
Expertise
Library Instruction
Librarians
Medical Libraries
School Libraries
Special Libraries
Academic Libraries
Public Libraries
url https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1467181