Naive vs. Sophisticated Methods of Forecasting Public Library Circulations.

Fuente: ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Brooks, Terrence A.
Formato: Recurso educativo Open Access
Lenguaje:en
Publicado: 1984
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1867181000725889024
author Brooks, Terrence A.
author_facet Brooks, Terrence A.
Brooks, Terrence A.
collection Education Resources Information Center
contents Naive vs. Sophisticated Methods of Forecasting Public Library Circulations. Brooks, Terrence A. Comparative Analysis Library Circulation Prediction Predictive Measurement Public Libraries Regression (Statistics) Research Methodology Tables (Data) Two sophisticated--autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), straight-line regression--and two naive--simple average, monthly average--forecasting techniques were used to forecast monthly circulation totals of 34 public libraries. Comparisons of forecasts and actual totals revealed that ARIMA and monthly average methods had smallest mean absolute percentage error. (20 references) (EJS)
format Recurso educativo Open Access
id eric_EJ303182
institution ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
language en
publishDate 1984
record_format eric
spellingShingle Naive vs. Sophisticated Methods of Forecasting Public Library Circulations.
Brooks, Terrence A.
Comparative Analysis
Library Circulation
Prediction
Predictive Measurement
Public Libraries
Regression (Statistics)
Research Methodology
Tables (Data)
Naive vs. Sophisticated Methods of Forecasting Public Library Circulations. Brooks, Terrence A. Comparative Analysis Library Circulation Prediction Predictive Measurement Public Libraries Regression (Statistics) Research Methodology Tables (Data) Two sophisticated--autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), straight-line regression--and two naive--simple average, monthly average--forecasting techniques were used to forecast monthly circulation totals of 34 public libraries. Comparisons of forecasts and actual totals revealed that ARIMA and monthly average methods had smallest mean absolute percentage error. (20 references) (EJS)
title Naive vs. Sophisticated Methods of Forecasting Public Library Circulations.
topic Comparative Analysis
Library Circulation
Prediction
Predictive Measurement
Public Libraries
Regression (Statistics)
Research Methodology
Tables (Data)
url https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ303182