Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Lingua: | en |
| Pubblicazione: |
1992
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ441529 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
Sommario:
- Medical School Libraries' Handling of Articles That Report Invalid Science. Pfeifer, Mark P. Snodgrass, Gwendolyn L. Censorship Evaluation Criteria Higher Education Library Materials Library Role Library Services Medical Libraries Medical Schools National Surveys Research Problems Research Reports Validity Survey of 95 medical school libraries found that 91.5 percent of copies of retracted articles were not tagged as being invalid, that 79 percent of the libraries had tagged none of the retracted studies; and only 16 percent had policies for managing articles that report invalid science. A common attitude against perceived library censorship was frequently expressed by respondents. (Author/DB)