Relevance Judgments of Actual Users and Secondary Judges: A Comparative Study.
Fuente:
ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Lingua: | en |
| Pubblicazione: |
1992
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1867181299424296960 |
|---|---|
| author | Janes, Joseph W. McKinney, Renee |
| author_facet | Janes, Joseph W. McKinney, Renee Janes, Joseph W. McKinney, Renee |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | Relevance Judgments of Actual Users and Secondary Judges: A Comparative Study. Janes, Joseph W. McKinney, Renee Comparative Analysis Higher Education Interrater Reliability Online Searching Relevance (Information Retrieval) Tables (Data) User Satisfaction (Information) Value Judgment This study examined judgments of document relevance made by library science graduate students who were not the originators of the queries for which the documents were retrieved. Although the secondary judgments compared well with those of the original users, it was found that secondary judges used document record fields differently and had a higher threshold of relevance. (16 references) (MES) |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_EJ446127 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 1992 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | Relevance Judgments of Actual Users and Secondary Judges: A Comparative Study. Janes, Joseph W. McKinney, Renee Comparative Analysis Higher Education Interrater Reliability Online Searching Relevance (Information Retrieval) Tables (Data) User Satisfaction (Information) Value Judgment Relevance Judgments of Actual Users and Secondary Judges: A Comparative Study. Janes, Joseph W. McKinney, Renee Comparative Analysis Higher Education Interrater Reliability Online Searching Relevance (Information Retrieval) Tables (Data) User Satisfaction (Information) Value Judgment This study examined judgments of document relevance made by library science graduate students who were not the originators of the queries for which the documents were retrieved. Although the secondary judgments compared well with those of the original users, it was found that secondary judges used document record fields differently and had a higher threshold of relevance. (16 references) (MES) |
| title | Relevance Judgments of Actual Users and Secondary Judges: A Comparative Study. |
| topic | Comparative Analysis Higher Education Interrater Reliability Online Searching Relevance (Information Retrieval) Tables (Data) User Satisfaction (Information) Value Judgment |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ446127 |