Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Janes, Joseph W., McKinney, Renee
Format: Recurso educativo Open Access
Language:en
Published: 1992
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ446127
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867181299424296960
author Janes, Joseph W.
McKinney, Renee
author_facet Janes, Joseph W.
McKinney, Renee
Janes, Joseph W.
McKinney, Renee
collection Education Resources Information Center
contents Relevance Judgments of Actual Users and Secondary Judges: A Comparative Study. Janes, Joseph W. McKinney, Renee Comparative Analysis Higher Education Interrater Reliability Online Searching Relevance (Information Retrieval) Tables (Data) User Satisfaction (Information) Value Judgment This study examined judgments of document relevance made by library science graduate students who were not the originators of the queries for which the documents were retrieved. Although the secondary judgments compared well with those of the original users, it was found that secondary judges used document record fields differently and had a higher threshold of relevance. (16 references) (MES)
format Recurso educativo Open Access
id eric_EJ446127
institution ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
language en
publishDate 1992
record_format eric
spellingShingle Relevance Judgments of Actual Users and Secondary Judges: A Comparative Study.
Janes, Joseph W.
McKinney, Renee
Comparative Analysis
Higher Education
Interrater Reliability
Online Searching
Relevance (Information Retrieval)
Tables (Data)
User Satisfaction (Information)
Value Judgment
Relevance Judgments of Actual Users and Secondary Judges: A Comparative Study. Janes, Joseph W. McKinney, Renee Comparative Analysis Higher Education Interrater Reliability Online Searching Relevance (Information Retrieval) Tables (Data) User Satisfaction (Information) Value Judgment This study examined judgments of document relevance made by library science graduate students who were not the originators of the queries for which the documents were retrieved. Although the secondary judgments compared well with those of the original users, it was found that secondary judges used document record fields differently and had a higher threshold of relevance. (16 references) (MES)
title Relevance Judgments of Actual Users and Secondary Judges: A Comparative Study.
topic Comparative Analysis
Higher Education
Interrater Reliability
Online Searching
Relevance (Information Retrieval)
Tables (Data)
User Satisfaction (Information)
Value Judgment
url https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ446127