Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McGrath, William E.
Format: Recurso educativo Open Access
Language:en
Published: 1993
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ462877
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867180734805966848
author McGrath, William E.
author_facet McGrath, William E.
McGrath, William E.
collection Education Resources Information Center
contents The Reappearance of Rankings: Reliability, Validity, Explanation, Quality, and the Mission of Library and Information Science. McGrath, William E. Educational Quality Evaluation Methods Graduate Students Higher Education Institutional Evaluation Library Administration Library Education Library Schools Multiple Regression Analysis Objectives Prestige Quality Control Reliability Research Libraries Research Methodology Research Problems Sample Size Statistical Analysis Validity Argues that perception studies and ranking are lacking in validity and reliability because of small sample size, simplistic statistical analyses, and the evaluation of quality by educators. It is asserted that quality control is more valid when evaluated by the customers of education, i.e., the students. (11 references) (EA)
format Recurso educativo Open Access
id eric_EJ462877
institution ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
language en
publishDate 1993
record_format eric
spellingShingle The Reappearance of Rankings: Reliability, Validity, Explanation, Quality, and the Mission of Library and Information Science.
McGrath, William E.
Educational Quality
Evaluation Methods
Graduate Students
Higher Education
Institutional Evaluation
Library Administration
Library Education
Library Schools
Multiple Regression Analysis
Objectives
Prestige
Quality Control
Reliability
Research Libraries
Research Methodology
Research Problems
Sample Size
Statistical Analysis
Validity
The Reappearance of Rankings: Reliability, Validity, Explanation, Quality, and the Mission of Library and Information Science. McGrath, William E. Educational Quality Evaluation Methods Graduate Students Higher Education Institutional Evaluation Library Administration Library Education Library Schools Multiple Regression Analysis Objectives Prestige Quality Control Reliability Research Libraries Research Methodology Research Problems Sample Size Statistical Analysis Validity Argues that perception studies and ranking are lacking in validity and reliability because of small sample size, simplistic statistical analyses, and the evaluation of quality by educators. It is asserted that quality control is more valid when evaluated by the customers of education, i.e., the students. (11 references) (EA)
title The Reappearance of Rankings: Reliability, Validity, Explanation, Quality, and the Mission of Library and Information Science.
topic Educational Quality
Evaluation Methods
Graduate Students
Higher Education
Institutional Evaluation
Library Administration
Library Education
Library Schools
Multiple Regression Analysis
Objectives
Prestige
Quality Control
Reliability
Research Libraries
Research Methodology
Research Problems
Sample Size
Statistical Analysis
Validity
url https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ462877