The Use and Misuse of Anthropological Methods in Library and Information Science Research.

Fuente: ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandstrom, Alan R., Sandstrom, Pamela Effrein
Format: Recurso educativo Open Access
Language:en
Published: 1995
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867181296967483392
author Sandstrom, Alan R.
Sandstrom, Pamela Effrein
author_facet Sandstrom, Alan R.
Sandstrom, Pamela Effrein
Sandstrom, Alan R.
Sandstrom, Pamela Effrein
collection Education Resources Information Center
contents The Use and Misuse of Anthropological Methods in Library and Information Science Research. Sandstrom, Alan R. Sandstrom, Pamela Effrein Bias Deduction Evaluation Methods Induction Information Science Literature Reviews Qualitative Research Research Reports Scientific Attitudes Scientific Methodology Validity Notes an antiscientific bias in writings that proclaim the value of qualitative approaches for studying information problems. Discusses the following methodological concerns: (1) scientific versus nonscientific traditions; (2) distinction between emic and etic perspectives; (3) artificial divide between qualitative and quantitative techniques; (4) inductive versus deductive research; and (5) challenges of portraying real people in scientific reports. (152 references) (Author/AEF)
format Recurso educativo Open Access
id eric_EJ503398
institution ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
language en
publishDate 1995
record_format eric
spellingShingle The Use and Misuse of Anthropological Methods in Library and Information Science Research.
Sandstrom, Alan R.
Sandstrom, Pamela Effrein
Bias
Deduction
Evaluation Methods
Induction
Information Science
Literature Reviews
Qualitative Research
Research Reports
Scientific Attitudes
Scientific Methodology
Validity
The Use and Misuse of Anthropological Methods in Library and Information Science Research. Sandstrom, Alan R. Sandstrom, Pamela Effrein Bias Deduction Evaluation Methods Induction Information Science Literature Reviews Qualitative Research Research Reports Scientific Attitudes Scientific Methodology Validity Notes an antiscientific bias in writings that proclaim the value of qualitative approaches for studying information problems. Discusses the following methodological concerns: (1) scientific versus nonscientific traditions; (2) distinction between emic and etic perspectives; (3) artificial divide between qualitative and quantitative techniques; (4) inductive versus deductive research; and (5) challenges of portraying real people in scientific reports. (152 references) (Author/AEF)
title The Use and Misuse of Anthropological Methods in Library and Information Science Research.
topic Bias
Deduction
Evaluation Methods
Induction
Information Science
Literature Reviews
Qualitative Research
Research Reports
Scientific Attitudes
Scientific Methodology
Validity
url https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ503398