The Use and Misuse of Anthropological Methods in Library and Information Science Research.
Fuente:
ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
1995
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867181296967483392 |
|---|---|
| author | Sandstrom, Alan R. Sandstrom, Pamela Effrein |
| author_facet | Sandstrom, Alan R. Sandstrom, Pamela Effrein Sandstrom, Alan R. Sandstrom, Pamela Effrein |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | The Use and Misuse of Anthropological Methods in Library and Information Science Research. Sandstrom, Alan R. Sandstrom, Pamela Effrein Bias Deduction Evaluation Methods Induction Information Science Literature Reviews Qualitative Research Research Reports Scientific Attitudes Scientific Methodology Validity Notes an antiscientific bias in writings that proclaim the value of qualitative approaches for studying information problems. Discusses the following methodological concerns: (1) scientific versus nonscientific traditions; (2) distinction between emic and etic perspectives; (3) artificial divide between qualitative and quantitative techniques; (4) inductive versus deductive research; and (5) challenges of portraying real people in scientific reports. (152 references) (Author/AEF) |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_EJ503398 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 1995 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | The Use and Misuse of Anthropological Methods in Library and Information Science Research. Sandstrom, Alan R. Sandstrom, Pamela Effrein Bias Deduction Evaluation Methods Induction Information Science Literature Reviews Qualitative Research Research Reports Scientific Attitudes Scientific Methodology Validity The Use and Misuse of Anthropological Methods in Library and Information Science Research. Sandstrom, Alan R. Sandstrom, Pamela Effrein Bias Deduction Evaluation Methods Induction Information Science Literature Reviews Qualitative Research Research Reports Scientific Attitudes Scientific Methodology Validity Notes an antiscientific bias in writings that proclaim the value of qualitative approaches for studying information problems. Discusses the following methodological concerns: (1) scientific versus nonscientific traditions; (2) distinction between emic and etic perspectives; (3) artificial divide between qualitative and quantitative techniques; (4) inductive versus deductive research; and (5) challenges of portraying real people in scientific reports. (152 references) (Author/AEF) |
| title | The Use and Misuse of Anthropological Methods in Library and Information Science Research. |
| topic | Bias Deduction Evaluation Methods Induction Information Science Literature Reviews Qualitative Research Research Reports Scientific Attitudes Scientific Methodology Validity |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ503398 |