The Utility of Electronic Mail Follow-Ups for Library Research.
Fuente:
ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Langue: | en |
| Publié: |
1998
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1867180858186661888 |
|---|---|
| author | Roselle, Ann Neufeld, Steven |
| author_facet | Roselle, Ann Neufeld, Steven Roselle, Ann Neufeld, Steven |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | The Utility of Electronic Mail Follow-Ups for Library Research. Roselle, Ann Neufeld, Steven Academic Libraries Comparative Analysis Cost Effectiveness Costs Electronic Mail Higher Education Interpersonal Communication Librarians Library Research Questionnaires Surveys Time A survey of academic librarians determined that the use of e-mail in the follow-up stage of a library research project using mailed questionnaires was as effective as postal mail in speed and size of response. Discusses additional benefits (interpersonal communication, reduced time and costs) and drawbacks (time spent identifying messages requiring reply or action) to using e-mail during the follow-up stage. (PEN) |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_EJ567742 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 1998 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | The Utility of Electronic Mail Follow-Ups for Library Research. Roselle, Ann Neufeld, Steven Academic Libraries Comparative Analysis Cost Effectiveness Costs Electronic Mail Higher Education Interpersonal Communication Librarians Library Research Questionnaires Surveys Time The Utility of Electronic Mail Follow-Ups for Library Research. Roselle, Ann Neufeld, Steven Academic Libraries Comparative Analysis Cost Effectiveness Costs Electronic Mail Higher Education Interpersonal Communication Librarians Library Research Questionnaires Surveys Time A survey of academic librarians determined that the use of e-mail in the follow-up stage of a library research project using mailed questionnaires was as effective as postal mail in speed and size of response. Discusses additional benefits (interpersonal communication, reduced time and costs) and drawbacks (time spent identifying messages requiring reply or action) to using e-mail during the follow-up stage. (PEN) |
| title | The Utility of Electronic Mail Follow-Ups for Library Research. |
| topic | Academic Libraries Comparative Analysis Cost Effectiveness Costs Electronic Mail Higher Education Interpersonal Communication Librarians Library Research Questionnaires Surveys Time |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ567742 |